Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary characteristic of included study in literature review

From: Implementations and strategies of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review

Studies, Years

Study design

Setting

Aim

Strategy/type of telehealth

Personnel involved

Outcomes/

findings

Berg et al., 2020 [8]

Not reported

Pediatric gastroenterology

Discussing implementation of telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic

Telehealth visits

Virtual check-in via telephone and audiovisual application,

E-visits through an online patient portal

Physicians and nonphysician healthcare providers

Practice recommendations for introducing and expanding telehealth

Saleem et al., 2020 [9]

Review

Ophthalmology

Discussing telehealth implementation methodologies during COVID-19 pandemic

Telehealth visit (telephone calls)

Virtual check-in

Digital encounters

Physicians

Teleophthalmology model mapping the telehealth visit cycle

Goenka et al., 2021 [10]

Retrospective review of cases

Radiation oncology

Implementing a telehealth service during the COVID-19 pandemic

Audio–video and telehealth platform

Physicians

Decrease in billable activity

Reduction of in-person visits

(from 100 to 21%)

Hron et al., 2020 [11]

Not reported

Inpatient clinics

Evaluating the implementation of telehealth program in response to COVID-19 pandemic

Videoconferencing system

Physicians and nursing clinical informatics experts

Usefulness of telehealth to perform physical exam, resulting from 1.820 inpatient telehealth sessions (13.3 sessions per 100 bedded days)

Strohl et al., 2020 [12]

Review

Laryngology

Implementing telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic Learning experiences and implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic

Video visit

Provider

(ie, laryngologist and/or speech-language pathologist)

Key areas included (1) how to set up and structure a telemedicine visit and maintain patient confidentiality, (2) patient examination and treatment initiation, (3) optimization of the tele-visit, (4) recognition of when a tele-visit is insufficient for patient care needs, (5) billing/reimbursement considerations

Franciosi et al., 2021 [13]

Cross-sectional

Primary care, pediatric and adult surgical and non-surgical cares

Evaluating the impact of telehealth implementation on underserved populations

Televisits and digital platform

Providers

Changes in patient demographics in telehealth visit, including a younger population, fewer non-English-speaking patients

The greatest number of telehealth visits in nonsurgical specialties

Cassar et al., 2021 [14]

Population-based study

COVID-19 evaluation

Implementing a telemedicine system to protect patients from COVID-19 transmission and to manage the infected patients

Teleworking system based on telephone communications, emails and a shared online database on portal platform

Experienced doctors, including emergency medicine, general medicine and geriatric medicine and an infectious disease specialist

Safely management of infected patients in the community

No increased morbidity or mortality related to the medical decisions using this telemedicine tool

Gentry et al., 2021 [15]

Cross-sectional

Mental health

Examining clinician satisfaction with telehealth services during Covid-19 pandemic

Video telehealth visits

Psychiatrists, psychologists, and mental health counselors

High levels of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of video telehealth in the opinions of clinicians

High levels of satisfaction of clinicians with video telehealth visits

Smith et al., 2021 [16]

Collection of participant questionnaire data

Obstetrics,

fetal ultrasound medicine

Evaluating women’s views of fetal ultrasound telemedicine and family costs

Video-conferencing

Fetal medicine specialist

Fetal cardiology clinics

High levels of satisfaction of women with video telehealth visits

Reduction in family costs and journey times

Checcucci et al., 2021 [17]

Collection of patient questionnaire data during call

Urology

Assessing the use of telemedicine to follow-up patients with benign urologic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic

Phone-call visits (phone counselling)

Medical staff

High appreciation by patients for telemedicine (phone visit comprehensibility, usefulness and ease of communication of exams)

Harris et al., 2020 [18]

Not reported

Post-acute and Long-term care facility for patients with COVID-19

Reporting systematic protocols for guiding telehealth intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic

Daily multidisciplinary virtual rounds and telemedicine consultation

Remote physical examination and videoconferencing

University physicians

Telehealth engineers

Lower mortality and hospitalization rates: during a month, 18 out of 48 (38%) facility residents required hospitalization and 6 (12.5%) died

No staff required hospitalization

Basil et al., 2021 [19]

Retrospective review

Neurosurgical evaluation

Providing guidelines to healthcare workers for performing neurological examination via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic

Telehealth visits

Neurosurgeons

Effectiveness of telehealth visits: of 2157 telehealth visits performed in department’s outpatient clinic visits only 26 converted to in-person visits for a more detailed patient evaluation

Leite et al., 2020 [20]

Viewpoint

COVID-19 evaluation

Discussing the strategic role of telehealth technologies in managing the COVID-19 pandemic

Electronic and telecommunications technologies

Physicians

Telehealth technologies as a frontline ally to avoid the spread of the virus, by tracking, testing and treating

Cerqueira-Silva et al., 2021 [21]

Case study

COVID-19 evaluation

Describing strategy that combines telehealth and medical training to mitigate the adverse effects of COVID-19

Tele-screening

Medical students

Physicians, including residents and medical doctors

Minimization of interpretation bias and rapid responses in unexpected situations

Not required for users to possess education level or be digitally literate in order to access the service