Table 17 Description of Studies: Insomnia
Authors, Year | Condition | CEA | CUA | Setting | N (participants) | Baseline Characteristics | Intervention/ comparator(s) | effectiveness measure(s); cost measures (price year) | Perspective | Time horizon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bonin et al. 2014 [37*] | Insomnia | ✓ | ✓ | England | Participants: | 151 | one-day CBT-I group workshop, led by two psychologists with CBT expertise, compared to a wait list control group. Intervention: 75 Control: 76 | EQ-5D; ISI; | Healthcare | 3mths |
Participants from 5 London boroughs who self-referred | Age in years (mean, SD): | Not given | £ (2008-09) | |||||||
Sex (% female): | 72 | |||||||||
Ethnicity (% white): | 81 | |||||||||
Thiart et al. 2016 [93*] | Insomnia | ✓ | Germany | N Participants: | 128 | internet-based CBT-I for school teachers with insomnia (6 modules with email feedback by trained clinical psychologists), compared to a waitlist control. Intervention: 64 Control: 64 | Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Reliable Change Index (RCI); | Societal | 6mths | |
Schools (recruiting teachers) | Age in years (mean, SD): | 48.0 (9.9) | Euros (2013) | |||||||
Sex (% female): | 74.2 | |||||||||
Ethnicity (% white): | Not given | |||||||||
Watanabe et al. 2015 [107*] | Insomnia | ✓ | Japan | N Participants: | 37 | 4 weekly individual sessions of CBT-I, based on a published treatment manual, compared to treatment as usual. Intervention: 20 Control: 17 | ‘Depression free days’ (DFD) (constructed from Ham-D Rating Scale scores), mapped to utility scores. | Healthcare | 8wks | |
Psychiatric outpatients | Age in years (mean, SD): | 50.5 (11.1), | US$ (2013) | |||||||
Sex (% female): | 62.2 | |||||||||
Ethnicity (% white): | Not given |