Themes | Sub-themes | Key emerging findings; illustrative evidence provided under each theme below |
---|---|---|
1. Dynamic nature of team composition | ‘Core’ or routine team | • Stable and permanent in constitution (members often physically present in NBU) • Minimal intra- and inter-cadre teamwork due to high patient to staff ratios • Consequently, care provision is largely fragmented, focused on task execution • Implicit goals/targets, that are assumed to be shared among providers • These targets are not just implicit but also ad hoc and reactional |
Emergency team | • Dynamic and time-related membership • Mostly constituted during scenarios/situations considered as emergency e.g., resuscitations • Often multidisciplinary, demonstrating efficient collaboration and coordination, and broken professional boundaries | |
 | Temporary ad hoc teams | • Innovative informal teams assembled to cope with high human resource demands • Included participation of students, support staff and mothers in executing ‘core’ team tasks • Characterised by informal task-sharing and task-shifting • While it provided opportunities for patient-centered care, had negative consequences on the quality of care |
2. The role of team relationships in nurturing team climate |  | • Positive relationships characterised by intra-cadre dependence and personal bonding appeared as a coping mechanism in this context • We observed lots of intra-cadre collaboration and support for one another, e.g. colleagues covered shifts/tasks for each other through local arrangements. • Interactions within the ‘core’ team encouraged learning, we observed lots of knowledge and skills sharing between nurses and junior doctors/clinical officers • Leadership practices adopted were key in promoting team cohesion and positive team working • E.g., Distributed forms of leadership promoted an open environment for interaction and collaboration rather than a hierarchical/authoritative one which undermined collective participation in decision-making. • Opportunities for information sharing and communication also promoted positive relationships: informal messaging apps such as WhatsApp emerged as useful spaces for both formal and informal communication |
3. The value of routines and rituals to NBU teams |  | • Institutionalized formal and informal routines and rituals such as monthly departmental meetings, daily prayers, and morning devotions shaped team cohesion, by enabling bonding over shared values and beliefs • A mission driven institutional culture seemed to promote openness, and co-existence between teams • On the contrary, inefficient bureaucracy and inertia which seemed persistent in public sector limited opportunities for interactions in both formal and informal routines |