Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the BaFAI

From: Barriers and facilitators to implementing a continuing medical education intervention in a primary health care setting

Factors identified as barriers

Intervention (n = 24) (% of total)

Control (n = 17) ((% of total)

Characteristics of the practice/innovation

 The online platform leaves enough room for me to make my own conclusions—compatibility

1 (4%)

1 (6%)

 The online platform leaves enough room to consider my patients related mental health needs – specificity

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 The online platform is a good starting point for my self- study – didactic flexibility/benefit

0 (0%)

1 (6%)

 Working according to the online platform is too time consuming – time investment

13 (54%)

10 (59%)

 The online platform does not fit into my ways of working at my practice—attractiveness

7 (29%)

6 (35%)

 The lay-out of this online platform makes it handy for use—attractiveness

2 (8%)

4 (23,5%)

Barriers deriving from the characteristics of the professionals

 I did not thoroughly use nor remember the online platform – training attitude

10 (42%)

10 (59%)

 I wish to know more about the online platform before I decide to apply it—innovation doubts

8 (33%)

10 (59%)

 I have problems changing my old routines. motivation and role

10 (42%)

10 (59%)

 I think parts of the online platform are incorrect perception knowledge

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 I have a general resistance to working according to protocols participation

3 (12,5%)

3 (18%)

 Fellow doctors (GPs) do not cooperate in applying the online platform—involvement

3 (12,5%)

7 (41%)

 Other doctors or assistants do not cooperate in applying the online platform—involvement

2 (8%)

4 (23,5%)

 Primary health care coordinators do not cooperate in applying the online platform—involvement

3 (12,5%)

4(23,5%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform … because I am not trained to use online platforms – work style

2 (8%)

2 (12%)

Barriers due to patient characteristics

 Patients do not cooperate in applying the online platform readiness to change

8 (8%)

3 (18%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform to patients due to ethnicity—characteristics

4 (17%)

4 (23,5%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform to patients of low socio-economic background—financial situation

5 (21%)

2 (12%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform to older patients (> 65 years old) age

6 (25%)

3 (18%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform to patients that rarely come to the primary health care unit—number of patient

contacts

15 (62,5%)

6 (35%)

Barriers arising from the intervention context

 Working according to this online platform requires financial compensation

1 (4%)

1 (6%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform if there is not enough supportive staff—support staff

3 (12,5%)

4 (23,5%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform if the instruments needed are not available—equipment suitable for practice

17 (71%)

13 (76%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform if physical spaces are missing (eg consultation office with computer)—location of facilities

16 (67%)

9 (53%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform if physical space is lacking (e.g. consulting room)- location of facilities

7 (29%)

9 (53%)

\({x}^{2}\) Pearson = 162,15

Pr = 0.130

Fisher’s exact = 0.012