Table 2 Participants’ Estimation of the Likelihood of Sepsis-Related Outcomes, Rated from 1 (‘Not likely at all’) to 5 (‘Most likely’), (N =13)
Stakeholder Group | Outcome | Likelihood of Outcome (Mode) |
|---|---|---|
MOH | Demand evidence on sepsis | 4 |
Organise training workshops on sepsis for health workers | 4 | |
Put sepsis as the indicator of the quality of the health system | 5 | |
Central hospitals & CSO (health worker unions) | Participate in training workshops on sepsis | 5 |
Accurately diagnose and report sepsis | 4 | |
Recognition of sepsis as a priority disease | 4 | |
Ethics committees & Regulatory bodies | Give permissions for clinical audit of patient records for quality improvement | 5 |
More multi-disciplinary clinical research on sepsis | 4 | |
Recognition of sepsis as a priority disease | 5 | |
Research organisations | Supply evidence on sepsis | 5 |
Implement policy engagement activities on sepsis | 4 | |
Organise conference tracks on sepsis | 4 | |
Training institutions | Agree on a definition of sepsis | 5 |
Teach how to accurately diagnose and report sepsis | 4 | |
Future health workers recognise sepsis as a priority disease | 4 | |
International funders | Convene stakeholders’ meetings on sepsis | 4 |
Put out calls for proposals around sepsis | 3 | |
Put sepsis on international donors' agenda | 3 | |
Media | Disseminate evidence on sepsis | 3 |
Implement public engagement activities on sepsis | 3 | |
Commemorate World Sepsis Day | 2 | |
Health workers | Participate in training workshops on sepsis | 5 |
Accurately diagnose and report sepsis | 4 | |
Recognition of sepsis as a priority disease | 4 |