Strong Leader-ship Support | Don’t go in cold | Two-way engage-ment | Edu-cation Com-ponent | Letter | Outcome | Number of Studies | Consistency | PRI | Cases |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Thomas, Lavela, Heinrich, LeMaitre |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Shannon |
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Sadlier |
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Ribner |
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Lopes |
1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Honda |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Guanche Garcel |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Doratoraj a (letter), Camarago, Zimmerman a (incentives), Zimmerman b (increased access) |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Dey a, Dey b |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Leitmeyer |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Doratoraj b (raffle) |
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Smedley |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Rothan-Tondeur (educ only) |