Interventions for FGM preventions | Level of Facility | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary (N = 43) | Secondary (N = 11) | Tertiary (N = 7) | Total (N = 61) | |||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Educated and advised on prevention of FGM | ||||||||
 No | 37 | 86 | 6 | 54.5 | 5 | 71.4 | 48 | 78.7 |
 Yes | 6 | 14 | 5 | 45.5 | 1 | 14.3 | 12 | 19.7 |
 Missing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.3 | 1 | 1.6 |
Advised on availability of linkage to authorities for reporting potential risk of FGM | ||||||||
 No | 30 | 69.8 | 7 | 63.6 | 3 | 42.9 | 40 | 65.6 |
 Yes | 13 | 30.2 | 4 | 36.4 | 3 | 42.9 | 20 | 32.8 |
 Missing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.3 | 1 | 1.6 |
Existence of mechanism for follow-up | ||||||||
 No | 31 | 72.1 | 10 | 90.9 | 2 | 28.6 | 43 | 70.5 |
 Yes | 11 | 25.6 | 1 | 9.1 | 4 | 57.1 | 16 | 26.2 |
 Missing | 1 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.3 | 2 | 3.3 |
Provision of IEC related materials to help with reinforcement of FGM prevention | ||||||||
 No | 43 | 100 | 8 | 72.7 | 6 | 85.7 | 57 | 93.4 |
 Yes | 0 | 0 | 3 | 27.3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.9 |
 Missing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.3 | 1 | 1.6 |
Advise on existence of link with community civil groups and gatekeepers to help in case of FGM | ||||||||
 No | 26 | 60.5 | 4 | 36.4 | 3 | 42.9 | 33 | 54.1 |
 Yes | 16 | 37.2 | 7 | 63.6 | 3 | 42.9 | 26 | 42.6 |
 Missing | 1 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.3 | 2 | 3.3 |
Possible outreaches in community to help with prevention of FGM | ||||||||
 No | 31 | 72.1 | 6 | 54.5 | 3 | 42.9 | 40 | 65.6 |
 Yes | 11 | 25.6 | 5 | 45.5 | 3 | 42.9 | 19 | 31.1 |
 Missing | 1 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.3 | 2 | 3.3 |