Table 2 Efforts to identify FGM and related complications by health workers during client-provider interactions
| Â | Level of Facility | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary N = 43 | Secondary N = 11 | Tertiary N = 7 | Total N = 61 | |||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Asked client on cut FGM status | ||||||||
 No | 38 | 88.4 | 6 | 54.5 | 7 | 100 | 51 | 83.6 |
 Yes | 4 | 9.3 | 5 | 45.5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 14.8 |
 Missing | 1 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.6 |
Asked about the severity of cut | ||||||||
 No | 40 | 93 | 9 | 81.8 | 7 | 100 | 56 | 91.8 |
 Yes | 3 | 7 | 2 | 18.2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8.2 |
Asked about possible effects of FGM | ||||||||
 No | 39 | 90.7 | 8 | 72.7 | 7 | 100 | 54 | 88.5 |
 Yes | 4 | 9.3 | 3 | 27.3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11.5 |
Explain how FGM might have undermined health physically and mentally | ||||||||
 No | 41 | 95.3 | 8 | 72.7 | 7 | 100 | 56 | 91.8 |
 Yes | 2 | 4.7 | 3 | 27.3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8.2 |