Skip to main content

Table 5 Baseline FP use and other characteristics regarding methods used in a trial that evaluated the effectiveness of enhanced FP education in Ugandan fishing communities

From: Evaluating the effectiveness of enhanced family planning education on knowledge and use of family planning in fishing communities of Lake Victoria in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial

Variable

Intervention n = 502(%)

Control n = 502(%)

FP use

 Yes

188 (37.5)

181 (36.1)

 No

314 (62.5)

321 (63.9)

FP Methods Used

 Pills

14 (7.2)

9 (4.8)

 Condom

67 (34.4)

64 (33.9)

 Injectable hormones

51 (26.2)

63 (33.3)

 Implant/Norplant

48 (24.6)

38 (20.1)

 Tubal-ligation

5 (2.6)

2 (1.1)

 Rhythm/ Withdrawal

5 (2.6)

3 (1.6)

 IUD/Coil

2 (1.0)

6 (3.2)

 Othera

3 (1.5)

4 (2.1)

Source of FP Method

 Government hospital/clinic

173 (92.0)

166 (91.7)

 Private hospital/clinic

8 (4.3)

11 (6.1)

 NGOs

3 (1.6)

4 (2.2)

 Ordinary Shop/weekly markets

3 (1.6)

0 (0.0)

 Otherb

1 (0.5)

0 (0.0)

Decision to use FP

 Mainly mine (respondent)

74 (39.4)

74 (40.9)

 Mainly spouse/partner

9 (4.8)

17 (9.4)

 Joint decision

105 (55.8)

89 (49.2)

 Otherc

0 (0.0)

1 (0.5)

Condom use in past 12 Months

 Yes

250 (53.1)

243 (53.9)

 No

221 (46.9)

208 (46.1)

Reasons for not using FP

 Infrequent/no sex

80 (23.6)

94 (27.0)

 Need for children/get pregnant

75 (22.1)

80 (23.0)

 Economic constraints

90 (26.5)

75 (21.6)

 Side effects of FP

45 (13.3)

38 (10.9)

 Menstrual problems

15 (4.4)

10 (2.9)

 Religion does not permit

14 (4.1)

14 (4.0)

 Culture encourages more children

9 (2.7)

14 (4.0)

 Spouse disapproved

7 (2.1)

13 (3.7)

 Lack of sexual satisfaction

4 (1.2)

10 (2.9)

  1. aVasectomy, emergency pills, Breast feeding, Herbs, Calendar, Abstinence
  2. bFP clinics, Medicine vendors
  3. cfriend/peer