Skip to main content

Table 4 The inter-rater reliability among 14 pharmacists for three sets of prescriptions compared using Cohen’s Kappa statistics after combining confusing criteria

From: Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China

 

TPs

HPs

CPs

Median Kappa 95% Cl)

Set1

 Before combination

0.61 (0.54–0.67)

0.63 (0.59–0.74)

0.59 (0.48–0.65)

 After combination

0.63 (0.57–0.70)*

0.63 (0.61–0.76)

0.59 (0.50–0.67)

Set2

 Before combination

0.66 (0.55–0.75)

0.75 (0.62–0.81)

0.64 (0.46–0.71)

 After combination

0.68 (0.57–0.75)*

0.75 (0.64–0.84)

0.64 (0.52–0.71)

Set3

 Before combination

0.80 (0.74–0.87) ∆, #

0.86 (0.75–0.88) ∆

0.75 (0.73–0.86) ∆, #

 After combination

0.80 (0.74–0.89) ∆, #

0.86 (0.77–0.89) ∆

0.75 (0.73–0.86) ∆, #

  1. TPs Total pharmacists, HPs Hospital pharmacists, CPs Community pharmacists, CI Confidence interval. * means p < 0.05, before vs. after combination; ∆ means p < 0.05, Set 3 vs. Set 1; # means p < 0.05, Set 3 vs. Set 2