Skip to main content

Table 4 Midwives in Sweden (N = 1754–1911); mean scores and standard deviation (SD) of COPSOQ III scales compared to Swedish reference values

From: Job satisfaction in midwives and its association with organisational and psychosocial factors at work: a nation-wide, cross-sectional study

COPSOQ III scales

High/ Low Levels Positive

Midwives in Sweden 2020

Mean (SD)

Swedish bench-marks Mean

Difference in mean values* (95% CI)

p-value

Quantitative demands**

L

49.2 (18.6)

40.9

8.3 (7.5–9.1)

 < .001

Work pace**

L

65.5 (20.0)

59.5

6.0 (5.1–6.9)

 < .001

Emotional demands**

L

67.4 (16.0)

46.8

20.6 (19.8–21.3)

 < .001

Influence at work**

H

37.0 (17.2)

50.2

-13.2 (-14.0– -12.5)

 < .001

Possibilities for development

H

72.5 (16.9)

70.4

2.1 (1.4–2.9)

 < .001

Variation of work***

H

75.9 (19.6)

68.0

7.9 (7.0–8.7)

 < .001

Meaning of work***

H

92.0 (13.9)

78.3

13.7 (13.0–14.3)

 < .001

Quality of work

H

64.0 (19.0)

68.2

-4.2 (-5.0– -3.3)

 < .001

Predictability

H

59.8 (18.1)

60.2

-0.4 (-1.2–0.4)

.298

Role clarity

H

77.2 (15.7)

78.1

-0.9 (-1.6 – -0.2)

.011

Role conflicts**

L

50.1 (18.9)

42.2

7.9 (7.1–8.8)

 < .001

Quality of leadership

H

51.4 (22.7)

54.1

-2.7 (-3.7 – -1.6)

 < .001

Social support from manager

H

70.4 (25.6)

75.3

-4.9 (-6.2 – -3.8)

 < .001

Social support from colleagues

H

79.2 (18.4)

80.2

-1.0 (-1.9 – -0.2)

.012

Recognition**

H

59.8 (23.0)

65.6

-5.8 (-6.9 – -4.8)

 < .001

Sense of community

H

78.7 (15.0)

79.9

-1.2 (-1.9 – -0.6)

 < .001

Job satisfaction

H

64.2 (19.1)

64.4

-0.2 (-1.1–0.6)

.633

Vertical trust, management

H

64.4 (19.6)

69.3

-4.9 (-5.8 – -4.0)

 < .001

Horizontal trust, employees

H

74.7 (17.3)

71.3

3.4 (2.6–4.2)

 < .001

Organisational justice**

H

53.3 (19.1)

59.7

-6.4 (-7.2 – -5.5)

 < .001

Self-rated health**

H

52.5 (24.0)

61.3

-8.8 (-10 – -7.7)

 < .001

Stress

L

40.2 (22.5)

36.0

4.2 (3.1–5.2)

 < .001

Burnout**

L

44.5 (22.3)

36.2

8.3 (7.3–9.4)

 < .001

  1. *Pejtersen et al. suggested a conventional minimal important score difference (MID) of ± 5 as a noticeable difference with clinical importance for the employee [22]
  2. ** Adverse MID from Swedish reference value [17, 22]
  3. *** Beneficial MID from Swedish reference value [17, 22]