Skip to main content

Table 3 TrACER implementation recommendations mapped to corresponding PRISM domains

From: Successes and challenges of implementing a cancer care delivery intervention in community oncology practices: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD

PRISM Domain

PRISM key suggestions

TrACER implementation experience

Intervention Organizational Perspective

Assure processes coordinate needs of all stakeholders

Working with clinical stakeholders to identify the most commonly prescribed chemotherapy regimens could have reduced the time and effort needed for sites to implement the reconfiguration. (recommendation 1)

Intervention Organizational Perspective

Simplify the intervention while maintaining essential elements

Distilling the intervention requirements into a concise set of expectations interpretable across practice settings increased site buy-in while maintaining fidelity. (recommendation 2)

Intervention Organizational Perspective

Assess the usability and adaptability of the intervention

Building flexibility into the protocol and allowing for additional time to implement allowed us to accommodate variation in workflow. (recommendation 3)

Intervention Organizational Perspective

Design monitoring so results can be seen early

Collecting feedback during and after the intervention from site principal investigators and clinical staff could have improved delivery of the intervention and informed the design of future CCD trials. (recommendation 4)

Characteristics of Organizational Recipients

Use existing staff during early stages to ease implementation

Sites preferred to use their existing IT teams to make changes to their order system so the external technical consultants were used in an advisory and supportive role.

(recommendation 5)

Characteristics of Organizational Recipients

Work with all levels of management to earn and communicate program support

Engage clinical leaders from planning through implementation and maintenance stages

Funding for two full time research support positions allowed the study team to cultivate and sustain strong relationships with clinical leaders, managers and other key staff positions at participating sites, staff multiple channels for communication, and be responsive to site concerns.

(recommendation 6)

External Environment

Work with policy and decision makers to alleviate burden or provide incentives when possible

We worked with payer stakeholders to provide information about reimbursement for guideline-informed PP-CSF prescribing to help alleviate site concerns and offered to work with them to develop a reimbursement mechanism if this became an issue during the trial. (recommendation 7)