Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the pairwise computed Spearman correlation coefficients

From: Using social network analysis methods to identify networks of physicians responsible for the care of specific patient populations

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

Spearman correlation coefficients (p-values)

(1)

Number of physicians

 

(2)

Number of patients

0.837

(< 0.001)

        

(3)

Number of different specializations

0.822

(< 0.001)

0.725

(< 0.001)

       

(4)

Number of practices

0.955

(< 0.001)

0.850

(< 0.001)

0.822

(< 0.001)

      

(5)

Average number of physicians per practice

–0.028

(0.524)

–0.135

(0.002)

–0.135

(< 0.001)

–0.293

(< 0.001)

     

(6)

Proportion of different physicians consulted within the network to all physicians

0.593

(< 0.001)

0.788

(< 0.001)

0.629

(< 0.001)

0.563

(< 0.001)

0.051

(0.252)

    

(7)

Proportion of physician consultations within the network to all physician consultations

0.552

(< 0.001)

0.811

(< 0.001)

0.598

(< 0.001)

0.557

(< 0.001)

–0.057

(0.196)

0.953

(< 0.001)

   

(8)

Network degree centrality

0.559

(< 0.001)

0.727

(< 0.001)

0.631

(< 0.001)

0.533

(< 0.001)

0.020

(0.656)

0.914

(< 0.001)

0.869

(< 0.001)

  

(9)

Network density

-0.379

(< 0.001)

-0.064

(0.148)

-0.148

(< 0.001)

-0.357

(< 0.001)

0.011

(0.807)

0.367

(< 0.001)

0.358

(< 0.001)

0.500

(< 0.001)

 

(10)

Clustering coefficient

-0.299

(< 0.001)

-0.074

(0.096)

-0.147

(< 0.001)

-0.335

(< 0.001)

0.157

(< 0.001)

0.344

(< 0.001)

0.296

(< 0.001)

0.437

(< 0.001)

0.827

(< 0.001)

  1. Notes: The values in bold indicate a significant correlation between the characteristics at a 0.1% significance level (p < 0.001)