Table 2 Propensity score analysis for outcome variables
From: Mental health and workplace factors: comparison of the Ghanaian and Australian mining industry
| Â | Â | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
K10 (Odds that k10 = high or very high) | |||
 Unadjusted | Ghana | 1.04(0.83, 1.31) | 0.75 |
Australia | ref | – | |
 Stabilised Propensity score adjusted | Ghana | 7.75(6.43, 9.34) | 0.01 |
Australia | ref | – | |
AUDIT: (odds that Audit risk = risky drinking (Audit stratum = 1)) | |||
 Unadjusted | Ghana | 0.10(0.08, 0.13) | < 0.01 |
Australia | ref | – | |
JCQ (Odds of JCQ ratio = job demands outweigh control) | |||
 Unadjusted | Ghana | *1.17(0.94, 1.45) | *0.17 |
Australia | Ref | – | |
 Stabilised Propensity score adjusted | Ghana | *1.54(1.02, 2.32) | * < 0.04 |
Australia | ref | – | |
SNI (modelling the odds of scoring medium, medium high or high vs low) | |||
 Unadjusted | Ghana | *4.98(3.80, 6.55) | * < 0.01 |
Australia | ref | – | |
 Stabilised Propensity score adjusted | Ghana | *5.21(1.97, 13.77) | * < 0.01 |
Australia | ref | – | |