Skip to main content

Table 6 One-way Analyses of Variance for the Effects of Role Seniority on Personalised and Holistic Care Constructs

From: Healthcare professionals’ perspective on delivering personalised and holistic care: using the Theoretical Domains Framework

One-Way ANOVA

Role Seniority

TDF constructs

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

F- ratio

Differences

Junior Nurse

Senior Nurse

Senior Doctor

Midwife

  

(n = 33)

(n = 15)

(n = 31)

(n = 19)

  

M

(S.E.)

M

(S.E.)

M

(S.E.)

M

(S.E.)

  

Social Support

5.60

(.18)

5.96

(.17)

5.44

(.16)

6.02

(.15)

2.37

 

Reinforcement

5.41

(.15)

5.73

(.24)

5.48

(.19)

5.98

(.21)

1.75

 

Priority

3.16

(.16)

3.89

(.27)

4.05

(.21)

4.51

(.30)

6.86**

D < F, G

Subjective Norm

5.41

(.19)

6.07

(.15)

5.90

(.18)

5.87

(.29)

1.94

 

Self-Monitoring

5.92

(.14)

6.50

(.18)

6.13

(.12)

6.61

(.11)

4.87**

E > D, F

Resources

5.40

(.20)

6.04

(.14)

5.52

(.14)

5.98

(.17)

3.04

 

Knowledge

5.71

(.15)

6.16

(.19)

5.98

(.14)

6.25

(.14)

2.42

 

Skills

5.62

(.14)

5.84

(.23)

5.91

(.14)

6.28

(.13)

3.07*

G > D

Self-efficacy

5.95

(.14)

6.09

(.18)

5.81

(.13)

6.49

(.08)

4.03**

G > D, F

Outcome Expectation

5.71

(.17)

5.87

(.25)

5.94

(.14)

6.39

(.13)

2.55

 

Professional Role

5.52

(.21)

6.27

(.23)

6.15

(.18)

6.45

(.13)

4.44**

G > D

Automaticity

5.17

(.23)

5.70

(.27)

5.40

(.18)

6.29

(.13)

4.84**

G > D, F

Action Planning

5.08

(.21)

5.58

(.23)

5.27

(.14)

6.14

(.10)

5.92**

G > D, F

  1. Legend: * = p ≤ .05, ** = p ≤ .01 Figures in bold are those constructs that are below 85% with group differences