Skip to main content

Table 5 One-way analyses of variance for the effects of professional group on personalised and holistic care constructs

From: Healthcare professionals’ perspective on delivering personalised and holistic care: using the Theoretical Domains Framework

One-Way ANOVA

Professional Group

TDF constructs

(A)

(B)

(C)

F- ratio

Differences

Nurse (n = 48)

Doctor (n = 33)

Midwife (n = 19)

M

(S.E.)

M

(S.E.)

M

(S.E.)

  

Social Support

5.71

(.13)

5.45

(.15)

6.02

(.15)

2.62

 

Reinforcement

5.51

(.12)

5.48

(.18)

5.98

(.21)

2.07

 

Priority

3.39

(.14)

4.07

(.21)

4.51

(.30)

7.95**

A < B, C

 Subjective Norm

5.61

(.15)

5.95

(.17)

5.87

(.29)

1.10

 

 Self-Monitoring

6.10

(.12)

6.15

(.12)

6.61

(.11)

3.54*

C > A, B

 Resources

5.60

(.15)

5.54

(.13)

5.98

(.17)

1.66

 

 Knowledge

5.85

(.12)

6.01

(.13)

6.25

(.14)

1.87

 

 Skills

5.69

(.12)

5.95

(.13)

6.28

(.13)

4.29*

C > A

 Self-efficacy

5.99

(.11)

5.80

(.12)

6.49

(.08)

6.24**

C > A, B

 Outcome Expectation

5.76

(.14)

5.98

(.14)

6.39

(.13)

3.72*

C > A

 Professional Role

5.75

(.17)

6.15

(.17)

6.45

(.13)

3.67**

C > A

 Automaticity

5.33

(.18)

5.42

(.17)

6.29

(.13)

5.89**

C > A, B

Action Planning

5.24

(.16)

5.29

(.14)

6.14

(.10)

7.18**

C > A, B

  1. Legend: * = p ≤ .05, ** = p ≤ .01 Figures in bold are those constructs that are below 85% with group differences