Skip to main content

Table 3 Classification of the high, medium, and low vulnerability provinces or cities in 2018 survey wave

From: Assessing the impact of public transfer payments on the vulnerability of rural households to healthcare poverty in China

Class

Range of vulnerability

(Average Value)

Provinces or Cites of VEP

(Poverty line = $1.9)

Provinces or Cites of VEP

(Poverty line = $3.2)

High vulnerability

60% ~ 70%

Beijing, Shanghai,

Zhejiang, Jiangsu,

Hainan, Shangxi

Beijing, Shanghai,

Zhejiang, Guangdong,

Jiangsu, Hainan,

Heilongjiang, Chongqing,

Hunan, Yunnan,

Shandong, Hebei, Shangxi

Moderate vulnerability

50% ~ 60%

Guangdong, Heilongjiang,

Chongqing, Hunan,

Yunnan, Fujian,

Shandong, Hebei,

Anhui, Shanxi,

Liaoning

Fujian, Henan,

Hubei, Jiangxi,

Anhui, Guizhou,

Shanxi, Sichuan,

Gansu, Liaoning

Low vulnerability

Below 50%

Henan, Tianjin, Hubei,

Jiangxi, Guangxi,

Guizhou, Sichuan,

Xinjiang, Tibet, Gansu, Jilin

Tianjin, Guangxi,

Xinjiang, Tibet,

Jilin

  1. Source: VEP estimation method using CFPS 2018 [31, 34,35,36, 56]