Skip to main content

Table 1 Training and Supervision, Time, Perception and Acceptability of Rapid Testing for Recent Infection for HIV among Health Care Workers in Blantyre District, Malawi, September 2019

From: Acceptability and feasibility of HIV recent infection surveillance by healthcare workers using a rapid test for recent infection at HIV testing sites — Malawi, 2019

n = 119

n (%) or median and range

Training and Supervision

 What type of training do you recommend for new colleagues who will be doing recent infection testing? (select all that apply)

  3- day MoH training

109 (92%)

  On-site training by colleagues

24 (20%)

  On-site training by recent infection site supervisors

30 (25%)

 How many times have you met with your recent infection site supervisor every month (on average)?

median: 4

range:1-10

 Which of the following written materials have you used when you perform a recent infection test (select all that apply)?

  Integrated Algorithm

109 (92%)

  Recent Infection SOP

114 (96%)

  RTRI Job Aid

102 (86%)

 Have you done a recency test QC exercise since your site started in April?

  Yes

116 (97%)

  No

3 (3%)

 If yes, how many times have you completed a QC since April?

median: 3

range: 1-20

 From your experience, what are some of the challenges in recent infection testing?

 

  Extra time and work

39 (33%)

  Not providing results to clients

12 (10%)

  Collecting blood via finger prick

11 (9%)

  Consent

7 (6%)

  Trusting the results

7 (6%)

Time

How much additional time do you think recent infection testing takes per client?

   ≤ 9 min

21 (18%)

  10 - 19 min

18 (15%)

   ≥ 20 min

80 (67%)

How much additional time does completing consent for recent infection testing take per client?

   ≤ 9 min

83 (70%)

  10 - 19 min

25 (21%)

   ≥ 20 min

11 (9%)

What part of recent infection testing takes the most additional time?

  Consent

19 (16%)

  Finger pricks

1 (1%)

  Documentation

35 (29%)

  DBS

35 (29%)

  Getting supplies ready

7 (6%)

  Waiting for RTRI results

20 (17%)

Perceptions and Acceptability

Overall, performing the RTRI is:

  Somewhat easy or very easy

98 (82%)

  Neither difficult nor easy

11 (9%)

  Somewhat easy or very difficult

10 (8%)

In your opinion, are clients accepting of recent infection surveillance?

  Very accepting

97 (82%)

  Somewhat accepting

22 (18%)

  Not accepting

0 (0%)

How does performing the RTRI compare to performing another rapid test?

  RTRIs are easier

29 (24%)

  Same

74 (62%)

  RTRIs are harder

16 (14%)

On average, how many additional finger pricks do you do when you perform a recent infection test (with one client)?

  No additional fingerpricks, I can get enough blood from the fingerpricks for the HTS algorithm

6 (5%)

  1 additional fingerprick

52 (44%)

  2 additional fingerpricks

43 (36%)

       >2 additional fingerpricks

18 (15%)

It is important to know if a person was infected with HIV in the last 12 months.

  Agree

101 (85%)

  Neither agree nor disagree

9 (8%)

  Disagree

9 (8%)

People who take the recent infection test should know the outcome of it.

  Agree

41 (35%)

  Neither agree nor disagree

27 (23%)

  Disagree

51 (43%)

It is easy to enter the results of the test and client information quickly in the recency register.

  Agree

108 (91%)

  Neither agree nor disagree

3 (3%)

  Disagree

8 (7%)

The use of the recency test in HTS improves the services offered to the clients.

  Agree

45 (38%)

  Neither agree nor disagree

37 (31%)

  Disagree

37 (31%)

  1. Abbreviations: MoH Ministry of Health, SOP Standard Operating Procedures, RTRI Rapid Test for Recent Infection, QC Quality Control