Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics - Rehabilitation: Unmatched and CEM

From: The effects of an innovative integrated care intervention in Brazil on local health service use by dependent older people

Characteristic

Unmatched

CEM

Non PMC, N = 26,1381

PMC, N = 5101

p-value2

Non PMC, N = 13331

PMC, N = 3251

Standardised mean difference

Individual variables

Female

8355 (32%)

133 (26%)

0.005

249 (19%)

70 (22%)

<.0001

Age

68 (64, 75)

78 (70, 84)

< 0.001

71 (66, 76)

73 (68, 80)

−0.002

Month of visit

  

> 0.9

   

 April

9462 (36%)

186 (36%)

 

553 (41%)

117 (36%)

<.0001

 June

7384 (28%)

141 (28%)

 

272 (20%)

87 (27%)

<.0001

 May

9292 (36%)

183 (36%)

 

508 (38%)

121 (37%)

<.0001

Latitude

609,445 (604,527, 612,848)

609,803 (605,519, 612,902)

0.4

609,499 (602,543, 612,915)

610,428 (605,507, 613,844)

−0.003

Longitude

7,798,942 (7,795,095, 7,802,850)

7,799,000 (7,794,381, 7,805,355)

0.7

7,798,390 (7,788,804, 7,801,427)

7,799,079 (7,794,637, 7,805,377)

0.004

Distance from household to health centre

419 (279, 578)

408 (275, 567)

0.3

421 (293, 599)

435 (287, 548)

<.0001

% Rehabilitation visit (Yes)

616 (2.4%)

71 (14%)

< 0.001

23 (1.7%)

34 (10%)

 

Micro-district variables

Social vulnerability Index (SVI)

0.43 (0.39, 0.49)

0.44 (0.40, 0.49)

< 0.001

0.44 (0.40, 0.49)

0.44 (0.40, 0.49)

<.0001

Household economic dependency on elderly (HEDR)

1.46 (0.88, 1.85)

1.62 (1.16, 1.93)

< 0.001

1.46 (0.83, 1.84)

1.54 (0.86, 1.86)

<.0001

Life expectancy (in years)

71.38 (69.20, 73.42)

70.79 (68.50, 72.76)

< 0.001

71.08 (69.20, 73.28)

71.01 (68.50, 72.80)

<.0001

Income per capita (in Brazilian reais)

419 (318, 556)

373 (292, 504)

< 0.001

406 (318, 549)

402 (299, 510)

<.0001

  1. 1n (%); Median (IQR)
  2. 2Pearson’s Chi-squared test; Wilcoxon rank sum test