Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics - Planned: Unmatched and CEM

From: The effects of an innovative integrated care intervention in Brazil on local health service use by dependent older people

Characteristic

Unmatched

CEM

Non PMC, N = 59,8121

PMC, N = 13171

p-value2

Non PMC, N = 47271

PMC, N = 9091

Standardised mean difference

Individual variables

Female

19,487 (33%)

373 (28%)

0.001

874 (18%)

208 (23%)

<.0001

Age

68 (64, 75)

79 (71, 85)

< 0.001

70 (65, 77)

76 (70, 82)

0.013

Month of visit

  

0.4

   

 April

21,498 (36%)

489 (37%)

 

1842 (39%)

347 (38%)

<.0001

 June

17,134 (29%)

355 (27%)

 

1183 (25%)

238 (26%)

<.0001

 May

21,180 (35%)

473 (36%)

 

1702 (36%)

324 (36%)

<.0001

Latitude

609,455 (604,703, 612,913)

609,813 (605,439, 612,932)

0.4

610,177 (603,614, 612,806)

610,174 (605,507, 613,770)

<.0001

Longitude

7,799,066 (7,795,080, 7,803,396)

7,798,510 (7,794,117, 7,803,848)

0.001

7,798,081 (7,788,783, 7,805,845)

7,798,454 (7,794,381, 7,804,153)

−0.004

Distance from household to health centre

420 (280, 578)

408 (267, 567)

0.056

409 (279, 575)

394 (257, 546)

<.0001

% Planned visit (Yes)

26,786 (45%)

695 (53%)

< 0.001

2270 (48%)

495 (54%)

 

Micro-district variables

 Social vulnerability Index (SVI)

0.44 (0.38, 0.49)

0.45 (0.42, 0.49)

< 0.001

0.49 (0.43, 0.49)

0.45 (0.42, 0.52)

<.0001

 Household economic dependency on elderly (HEDR)

1.54 (0.89, 1.85)

1.62 (1.17, 1.86)

< 0.001

1.62 (0.86, 1.92)

1.62 (1.16, 1.86)

<.0001

 Life expectancy (in years)

71.38 (69.20, 73.42)

70.79 (68.50, 72.76)

< 0.001

69.20 (68.47, 71.42)

70.53 (68.47, 72.40)

<.0001

 Income per capita (in Brazilian reais)

419 (318, 556)

373 (305, 504)

< 0.001

318 (299, 423)

359 (299, 463)

<.0001

  1. 1n (%); Median (IQR)
  2. 2Pearson’s Chi-squared test; Wilcoxon rank sum test