Skip to main content

Table 1 Study population (quantitative phase)

From: How important is income in explaining individuals having forgone healthcare due to cost-sharing payments? Results from a mixed methods sequential explanatory study

Group:

 

“Having utilized healthcare” (n = 6291)

“Having forgone healthcare” (n = 1048)

Age (in years) ***

Mean (sd)

63.0 (10.9)

57.8 (10.9)

Gender (%) ***

Male

49.1

39.4

Female

50.9

60.6

Household situation (%) ***

Living alone

71.2

61.7

Married or living together

27.3

35.8

Missing

1.5

2.5

Self-reported health (%) ***

(Very) poor

18.5

21.8

Moderate

40.9

46.1

(Very) good

40.6

32.1

Chronic conditions (%) ***

None

15.4

18.4

One or more

84.6

81.6

Education level (%) ***

Low

22.8

26.4

Moderate

30.2

34.0

High

42.8

35.2

Missing

4.2

4.4

Sense of mastery (Pearlin’s scale) A ***

Mean (sd)

22.6 (5.7)

20.5 (5.9)

Monthly net household income (%) ***

 < €2000

34.9

63.0

€2001-€3000

25.9

15.6

€3001-€4000

13.6

5.0

 > €4000€

7.6

2.1

Not-disclosed

18.0

14.3

Financial leeway (%) ***

Incurring debts or using savings

19.7

44.0

Just enough to live on

32.2

36.0

Saving money

46.3

18.5

Not-disclosed

1.8

1.5

Respondents per healthcare service

N of individuals (% of group)

Prescribed medications

5537 (88.0)

475 (45.3)

Ordered diagnostic tests

4189 (66.6)

738 (70.4)

Specialist care

3603 (57.3)

662 (63.2)

  1. Chi square tests and independent t-tests were used to identify systematic differences between both groups. A = measured by the Pearlin Mastery Scale Test in which the lowest possible summed score of 7 reflected a lacking sense of mastery, while the highest possible score of 35 reflected a complete sense of mastery [24]
  2. sd standard deviation. *** p-value < 0.05. *** p-value < 0.01