Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and practice characteristics of study participants

From: The attitude and acceptability towards medical promotional tools and their influence on physicians’ prescribing practices in Jordan and Iraq: a cross-sectional study

Variable

Overall (n= 801)

Jordan (n= 401)

Iraq (n= 400)

P-value

Age (years) (mean (SD))

45.9 (10.4)

45.1 (9.2)

46.6 (11.5)

0.037

Gender

 Males

545 (68.0%)

274 (68.3%)

271 (67.8%)

0.460

Years of experience

 Less than 5 years

89 (11.1%)

30 (7.5%)

59 (14.8%)

0.004

 6 – 10 years

178 (22.2%)

96 (23.9%)

82 (20.5%)

 More than 10 years

534 (66.7%)

275 (68.6%)

259 (64.8%)

Qualification

 General practitioner

205 (25.6%)

69 (17.2%)

136 (34.0%)

0.000

 Specialist

596 (74.4%)

332 (82.8%)

264 (66.0%)

Practice site

 Public healthcare

144 (18.0%)

54 (13.5%)

90 (22.5%)

0.003

 Private clinic

200 (25.0%)

111 (27.7%)

89 (22.2%)

 Both

457 (57.1%)

236 (58.8%)

221 (55.3%)

References used by healthcare professionals during their daily life practices for prescribing: (more than one answer can be chosen)

 Consultation of drug promoters

120 (15.0%)

31 (7.7%)

89 (22.3%)

0.000

 Pharmaceutical company drug guides

277 (34.5%)

105 (26.1%)

172 (43.0%)

 Medical text books

411 (51.3%)

177 (44.1%)

234 (58.5%)

 Academic journals

360 (44.9%)

167 (41.6%)

193 (48.4%)

 Consultation with specialist doctor

230 (28.7%)

91 (22.7%)

139 (34.8%)

 Consultation with other GPs

129 (16.1%)

66 (16.4%)

63 (15.8%)