Skip to main content

Table 2 CASP & GRADE-CERQual

From: Health practitioners’ perceptions of structural barriers to the identification of intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis

Author

Statement of aim

Qualitative methodology appropriate

Research design appropriate

Recruitment strategy appropriate

Relationship between researcher & participants adequately considered

Ethical issues taken into consideration

Data analysis sufficiently rigorous

Findings supported by evidence

Other limitations

GRADE-CERQual assessment of quality

Al-Natour et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Limited data supporting themes

No or very minor concerns

Alvarez et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Arboit et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Limited details on recruitment

No or very minor concerns

Aziz & El-Gazzar

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low generalisability

No or very minor concerns

Baig et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Baird et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Bender

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Benyon et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Briones-Vozmediano et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Columbini et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Danitz et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Efe & Taskin

Yes

Yes

Yes

yes

Unclear

Partial

Yes

Yes

No details on ethics and data analysis

Minor concerns.

Fay-Hillier et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Finnbogadottir & Dykes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Gomez-Fernandez et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Recruitment not clear

Minor concerns.

Gotlib Conn et al

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Guruge

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Hatcher et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Potential risk of bias

No or very minor concerns

Henriksen et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Horwood et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Iverson et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Jack et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Kopcavar et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Mauri et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

Yes

Yes

No limitations acknowledged

No or very minor concerns

McCall-Hosenfeld et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

McCauley et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Papadakaki et al.

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

There was no means to control for bias

Minor concerns

Pitter

Yes

yes

Yes

Partial

yes

Yes

Partial

Partial

Concerns around sample recruitment, data analysis and discussion

Moderate concerns

Rahmqvist et al.

Yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Ramachandran et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

yes

Yes

N/A

Minor concerns

Shamu et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Limitations not clear

Minor concerns

Sprague et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Sun et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Partial

Partial

Yes

Concern around ethical issue and data collection

Minor concerns

Sundborg et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Usta et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

Yes

Yes

Concerns about data collection

Minor concerns

Van der Wath

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Partial

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or minor concerns

Visentin et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Wild et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Potential risk of bias

No or very minor concerns

Williams et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

Limited quotes to support evidence

Minor concerns

Wilson et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

No or very minor concerns

Wyatt et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Potential risk of bias

No or very minor concerns

Yeung et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

N/A

Minor concerns

Zijlstra et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

Yes

Concerns about ethical approval

Minor concerns