Skip to main content

Table 2 Determinants of CQR-IR development identified in focus groups and interview

From: Stakeholder views of the development of a clinical quality registry for interventional radiology: a qualitative study

COM-B components

TDF domains

Specific factors identified as determinants for CQR-IR development

Potential intervention functions

 Capability

Knowledge

Knowledge about CQR rationale

Education about CQR

  

Knowledge about implementing CQR

Training in registry development and use

 Motivation

Goals

Aims of CQR

Education about CQR

 

Beliefs about consequences

Benefits and costs

Participant persuasion

 

Professional role 

Role boundaries of radiologists and radiographers

Participant persuation and incentivising 

 

Beliefs about capabilities

Registry user-friendliness

Participant incentivising

 

Optimism

Organisational culture

Enabling teamwork and mutual engagement

 

Emotions

Resistance, stress

Enabling teamwork and mutual engagement 

 Opportunity

Resources

Staff, financing, time, management support

Environmental restructuring

 

Social influences

Associations

 
  

SRIR