|
Opinion on the feasibility of the calls (n = 196)
|
|
The workload to successfully reach the PCP is low
|
85% (168)
|
|
The hospitalist did not encounter difficulties to reach the PCP
|
63% (123)
|
|
The time required to establish contact with the PCP is less than 10 min
|
63% (124)
|
|
Opinion on the benefits of the calls (n = 157)
|
|
The call was useful and improved patient management
|
88% (138)
|
|
The hospitalist is satisfied with the call
|
97% (153)
|
|
The call is considered redundant with the “liaison letter” and the discharge summary.
|
53% (83)
|
|
The transmitted informations will be taken into account by the PCP in his management
|
94% (147)
|
|
The new informations collected during this call are useful or essential
|
57% (89)
|
|
The call gave the feeling of securing the patient’s discharge to the hospitalist
| |
| |
- in terms of medical care (n = 157)
|
91% (142)
|
| |
- in terms of medications (n = 146)
|
73% (106)
|
| |
- in terms of social care (n = 71)
|
50% (35)
|
|
PCPs’ OPINIONS
|
|
Are you satisfied with this call?
|
100% (130)
|
|
As a result of this call, do you plan to see your patient again within 15 days? a
|
78% (101)
|
|
Would you like this call to become systematic to prepare your patient discharge?
|
83% (109)
|
|
Would you prefer to receive this information in another way?
|
49% (64)
|
|
If yes, which one? b
|
by email
|
51% (31)
|
| |
by web-based platform (« Zepra »)
|
39% (24)
|
| |
by postal mail
|
7% (4)
|
| |
by « liaison letter »
|
3% (2)
|
