Skip to main content

Table 3 Moderation analysis for the effect of EC for the impact of Job Satisfaction on Organisational Commitment

From: The moderating effect of emotional competence on job satisfaction and organisational commitment of healthcare professionals

  Organisational Commitment (dependent variable)
  Model 1 Model 2 Model3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 Model 9
Variables b SE b SE b SE b SE b SE b SE b SE b SE b SE
Gender −.07 .16 −.05 .15 −.05 .16 −.07 .15 −.09 .16 −.05 .15 −.04 .15 −.07 .16 −.09 .15
Age −.05 .08 −.07 .08 −.08 .09 −.04 .08 −.04 .08 −.05 .08 −.06 .09 −.06 .08 −.08 .08
Job Satisfaction .48** .11 .55** .12 .49** .12 .61** .11 .54** .12 .59** .11 .48** .11 .48** .12 .51** .11
Attention to one’s own emotions (AE)    −.02 .12               
Job Satisfaction x AE    −.42* .18               
Clarity of emotional perception (CP)      −.00 .13             
Job Satisfaction x CP      −.19 .19             
Perspective taking (PER)        .23* .11           
Job Satisfaction x PER        −.52** .14           
Trust in one’s own expressivity (TE)          −.01 .07         
Job Satisfaction x TE          −.26* .12         
Positive expressivity (PE)            .05 .12       
Job Satisfaction x PE            −.58** .16       
Negative expressivity (NE)              .06 .11     
Job Satisfaction x NE              −.40* .16     
Reflective handling of emotions (RE)                .01 .11   
Job Satisfaction x RE                −.13 .18   
Influencing one’s own emotions (IN)                  .25* .10
Job Satisfaction x IN                  −.38* .17
F 6.23**   4.96**   3.96**   7.73**   4.56**   7.10**   5.20**   3.70**   5.62**
R2 .18   .23   .20   .32   .22   .37   .25   .19   .26
ΔR2 .17**   .05*   .01   .12**   .05*   .11**   .06*   .01   .05*
  1. Note: N = 87 due to missing data, b = regression coefficient, SE = standard error of the regression coefficient, F = F-test, R2 = coefficient of determination, ΔR2 = additional R2* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01