Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the home care clients in AdHOC and IBenC

From: Changes in home care clients’ characteristics and home care in five European countries from 2001 to 2014: comparison based on InterRAI - Home Care data

 

Belgium

  

Finland

  

Germany

  

Iceland

  

Italy

   

the Netherlands

 

All

     
 

AcHOC1)

IBenC

AcHOC2)

IBenC

AcHOC2)

IBenC

AcHOC2)

IBenC

AcHOC2)

IBenC

AcHOC2)

IBenC

AcHOC

IBenC

IBenC4)

Study sample - (n)

   

(525)

 

(187)

 

(456)

 

(607)

 

(493)

 

(405)

 

(420)

 

(412)

 

(499)

 

(197)

 

(491)

 

(1808)

 

(2884)

 

(2359)

Female - % (n)

  

67.0

(352)

82.2

(154)

68.6

(313)

74.7

(453)

71.2

(351)

74.1

(300)

69.5

(292)

63.1

(260)

57.3

(286)

77.3

(152)

68.4

(336)

73.0

(1319)

66.9

(1930)

66.9

(1578)

Living alone - % (n)

  

48.0

(252)

83.8

(157)

80.9

(369)

62

(375)

73

(359)

68.2

(276)

61.0

(256)

12.8

(53)

16.4

(82)

61.6

(121)

68.8

(338)

54.3

(982)

57.4

(1656)

59.4

(1404)

Age, years - mean (SD)

  

82.4

(6.7)

81.2

(7.7)

82.7

(7.0)

81.3

(7.9)

84.2

(7.6)

81.4

(7.6)

83.7

(7.0)

80.2

(8.0)

81.8

(7.9)

80.4

(6.7)

82.5

(7.1)

81.0

7.6

83.0

(7.3)

83.0

(7.4)

CPS score - mean (SD)

  

1.4

(1.6)

0.7

(1.0)

1.3

(1.2)

1.4

(1.8)

1.6

(1.7)

0.6

(1.0)

1.1

(1.2)

2.0

(2.0)

2.4

(2.1)

1.0

(1.1)

0.6

(0.9)

1.1

(1.2)

1.4

(1.6)

1.4

(1.6)

ADLH score - mean (SD)

  

3.2

(1.2)

0.2

(0.9)

0.8

(1.3)

1.6

(1.8)

2.2

(1.7)

0.2

(0.7)

0.6

(1.1)

2.8

(2.0)

3.8

(1.7)

0.2

(0.8)

0.5

(1.1)

1.0

(0.7)

1.9

(2.0)

1.6

(1.9)

Hours of formal care - mean (SD)3)

 

8.5

(7.8)

2.2

(1.0)

5.1

(5.2)

2.7

(0.8)

7.5

(6.9)

2.2

(0.9)

3.6

(3.8)

1.3

(0.7)

1.0

(2.6)

2.6

(0.9)

4.6

(4.7)

2.2

(0.8)

5.1

(6.1)

4.4

(4.6)

  1. 1) Belgium did not participate in AdHOC
  2. 2) Data for AdHOC from [8] in the reference list
  3. 3) Data for IBenC from [11] in the reference list
  4. 4) IBenC without Belgium