Table 2 Factors associated with initial enrollment in the home-based postnatal coordinated care (PRADO) for all of the women eligible for this program. Probit regression model (n = 4189)
From: Access-to-care: evidence from home-based postnatal coordinated care after hospital discharge
Coefficient | [95% CI] | |
|---|---|---|
Household characteristics | ||
Woman’s age at pregnancy (years) | ||
18–23 | − 0.31*** | [− 0.44;-0.18] |
24–29 | − 0.04 | [− 0.13;0.05] |
30–35 | reference | |
36–41 | 0.07 | [− 0.04;0.18] |
≥ 42 | − 0.42** | [− 0.69;-0.14] |
Number of children | ||
1 | reference | |
2 | −0.09 | [− 0.20;0.02] |
3 | − 0.28*** | [− 0.40;-0.17] |
≥ 4 | − 0.31*** | [− 0.47;− 0.15] |
Woman’s healthcare coverage | ||
Policyholder | reference | |
Beneficiary | -0.15* | [−0.28;-0.01] |
Prenatal care | ||
Antenatal visits | ||
0–5 | − 0.05 | [−0.19;0.09] |
6–7 | reference | |
≥ 8 | −0.02 | [− 0.13;0.09] |
Follow-up by a gynecologista | ||
No | reference | |
Yes | −0.09 | [− 0.23;0.06] |
Follow-up by a general practitionera | ||
No | reference | |
Yes | 0.09 | [−0.03;0.21] |
Follow-up by a midwifea | ||
No | reference | |
Yes | −0.10 | [−0.24;0.04] |
Hospital follow-upa | ||
No | reference | |
Yes | −0.06 | [− 0.23;0.11] |
Community follow-upa | ||
No | reference | |
Yes | −0.07 | [− 0.23;0.10] |
Obstetric ultrasound | ||
0–1 | − 0.07 | [− 0.22;0.08] |
2–3 | reference | |
≥ 4 | 0.03 | [− 0.09;0.14] |
Prenatal education | ||
No | reference | |
Yes | 0.46*** | [0.36;0.56] |
Prenatal information regarding postpartum | ||
No | reference | |
Yes | 0.72*** | [0.51;0.93] |
Municipality characteristics | ||
Location | ||
Urban | reference | |
Rural | 0.07 | [−0.14;0.28] |
Household deprivationb | ||
Least deprived | reference | |
Less deprived | 0.24 | [−0.09;0.56] |
More deprived | 0.07 | [−0.27;0.42] |
Most deprived | −0.04 | [−0.40;0.32] |
Accessibility to a gynecologistc | ||
Lowest | reference | |
Low | −0.08 | [− 0.24;0.09] |
High | 0.09 | [−0.14;0.33] |
Highest | 0.53** | [0.20;0.86] |
Accessibility to a general practitionerc | ||
Lowest | reference | |
Low | 0.00 | [−0.30;0.30] |
High | 0.06 | [−0.26;0.37] |
Highest | 0.06 | [−0.26;0.38] |
Accessibility to a midwifec | ||
Lowest | reference | |
Low | 0.16 | [−0.06;0.39] |
High | 0.15 | [−0.09;0.39] |
Highest | −0.09 | [−0.39;0.21] |
Hospital characteristics | ||
Funding | ||
Public | reference | |
Private | −0.39* | [−0.73;-0.06] |
University status | ||
Non-teaching | reference | |
Teaching | 0.41*** | [0.24;0.59] |
Level of care | ||
No neonatology unit | reference | |
Neonatology unit | − 0.43*** | [− 0.66;-0.19] |
Neonatal intensive care unit | −0.48** | [− 0.83;-0.12] |
Obstetriciansd | −2.07** | [−3.56;-0.57] |
Midwivesd | −0.82** | [−1.45;-0.19] |
Day of delivery | ||
Working | reference | |
Non-working | 0.28* | [0.01;0.55] |
Day of discharge | ||
Working | reference | |
Non-working | −0.25* | [− 0.48;− 0.02] |