Table 3 Fractional regression models showing facility characteristics associated with PAC and SAC proportional capacity scores
PAC | SAC | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Basic PAC | Comprehensive PAC | Â | Basic SAC | Comprehensive SAC | ||||
| Â | Primary facilities | Referral facilities | Â | Primary facilities | Referral facilities | ||||
Covariates | Marginal effects†(95% CI) | Marginal effects†(95% CI) | Covariates | Marginal effects†(95% CI) | Marginal effects†(95% CI) | ||||
PAC Caseloads | Â | Â | Â | Â | SAC Caseloads | Â | Â | Â | Â |
One PAC patient per month or less | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | ||
Up to one PAC patient per week | 0.07 (0.02–0.12)** | 0.13 (0.05–0.21)** | Up to one SAC patient per week | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | ||||
Up to two PAC patients per week | 0.08(−0.04–0.21) | 0.13 (0.05–0.22)** | Up to two SAC patients per week | 0.05(−0.01–0.11) | 0.00(− 0.08–0.09) | ||||
Greater than two PAC patients per week | 0.28 (0.15–0.42)*** | 0.14 (0.04–0.24)** | Greater than two SAC patients per week | 0.03(− 0.08–0.14) | − 0.02(− 0.13–0.09) | ||||
Managing authority | Â | Â | Â | Â | Managing authority | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Public | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | Public | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | ||||
Private or faith-based | 0.03(−0.04–0.10) | −0.07(− 0.13 – − 0.01)* | Private or faith-based | −0.05(− 0.12–0.02) | −0.08(− 0.18–0.02) | ||||
Residence | Â | Â | Â | Â | Residence | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Urban | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | Urban | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | ||||
Rural | 0.00(−0.06–0.06) | 0.07 (0.01–0.13)* | Rural | − 0.08(− 0.14 – − 0.01)* | 0.03(− 0.04–0.10) | ||||
Number of deliveries per year | 0.00(−0.00–0.00) | 0.00 (0.00–0.00)* | Number of deliveries per year | 0.00(− 0.00–0.00) | 0.00(−0.00–0.00) | ||||
Staff training in vacuum aspiration‡ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
No staff trained | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | ||
One or more staff trained | 0.12 (0.07–0.18)*** | 0.23 (0.11–0.35)*** |  |  |  |  |  | ||