Skip to main content

Table 1 Practice Characteristics, Colorado and Kansas, 2018–2021

From: Protocol refinement for a diabetes pragmatic trial using the PRECIS-2 framework

Contextual Characteristics

Overall (n = 22)

Patient-Driven Condition (n = 11)

Standardized Condition (n = 11)

Difference across conditions*

Practice Type: N (%) Federally Qualified Health Centers

12 (54%)

5 (45%)

5 (45%)

p = 1.00

Practice Location: N (%)

 Urban

17 (77%)

9 (82%)

8 (73%)

p = 1.00

 Rural

3 (14%)

1 (9%)

2 (18%)

 

 Suburban

2 (9%)

1 (9%)

1 (9%)

 

Estimated No. of Diabetes Patients: median (range)

549 (90–4000)

500 (90–4000)

576 (214–2112)

p = 0.48

Hispanic/Latino Patients > 10%: N (%) of practices

10 (67%)

5 (63%)

5 (71%)

p = 1.00

Minority Patients > 20%: N (%) of practices

13 (87%)

5 (71%)

8 (100%)

p = 0.20

Payer Mix: Median (range)

 Private insurance fee for service (FFS) or preferred provider organization

11 (3–70)

12 (3–64)

10 (5–70)

 

 Private managed care

11 (5–35)

15 (10–20)

10 (5–35)

 

  Medicare

19 (2–60)

20 (9–30)

14 (2–60)

 

  Medicaid

40 (2–63)

30 (5–60)

55 (2–63)

 

  Other public insurance

3 (0–5)

3 (0–5)

3 (0–5)

 

  Self-pay or uninsured

10 (0–92)

6 (0–92)

10 (3–36)

 

  Unknown

0 (0–10)

0 (0–10)

0 (0–5)

 

  Other

4 (0–100)

0 (0–0)

9 (0–100)

 

Private (FFS + Managed Care) > (Medicare + Medicaid + Other Pub)

3 (19%)

2 (29%)

1 (11%)

p = 0.55

No. Clinicians with prescribing privileges: Median (range)

8 (2–65)

7 (2–39)

8 (3–65)

p = 0.39

No. Staff eligible to be health educator: median (range)

2 (1–6)

2 (1–6)

3 (1–6)

p = 0.79

Previous experience with SMAs: N (%)

10 (45%)

5 (45%)

5 (45%)

p = 1.00