Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the Segmentation Study sample by study arm, Dosso region, Niger, 2020

From: Assessment of segmentation and targeted counseling on family planning quality of care and client satisfaction: a facility-based survey of clients in Niger

 

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Total

Characteristic

n = 679a

n = 898a

n = 1143a

n = 2720a

Use of FP at time of visit

 New user (non-user)

41.83

54.79

44.71

47.32

 Continuing user

58.17

45.21

55.29

52.68

Age of the woman

 15–19

13.25

12.03

12.95

12.72

 20–24

27.25

28.06

28.70

28.13

 25–29

26.51

26.50

23.45

25.22

 30–34

17.08

17.71

17.24

17.35

 35–39

10.75

10.91

12.25

11.43

 40+ years

5.15

4.79

5.42

5.15

Marital status

 Unmarried (divorced, widowed, never married, refusal)

0.24

2.45

1.22

1.50

 Married or living with partner

99.26

97.55

98.78

97.50

Level of education*

 None

49.85

38.31

53.28

47.48

 Quranic/literate

14.01

31.63

18.81

21.85

 Primary

16.08

16.04

15.57

15.85

 Secondary or higher

20.06

14.03

12.34

14.82

Parity

 0–1

22.42

19.09

20.18

20.38

 2

20.33

21.26

22.95

21.73

 3

17.34

17.71

17.14

17.38

 4

14.35

15.09

14.64

14.71

 5

12.26

10.97

10.80

11.22

 6+

13.30

15.89

14.29

14.56

Segmented*

 No

29.01

49.44

NA

 

 Yes

49.19

44.65

NA

 

 Missing

21.80

5.90

NA

 

Received a method during visit

 No

6.25

11.11

6.75

8.08

 Yes

93.75

88.89

93.25

91.92

Method received (among those who adopted)

 Implant

12.03

17.55

10.48

13.15

 IUD

0.16

0.63

0.00

0.24

 Injectable

56.26

53.54

62.95

58.24

 Pill

31.54

28.28

26.38

28.29

 Other

0.00

0.00

0.19

0.08

  1. aSome n’s smaller due to a small amount of missing information
  2. *p ≤ 0.05 for chi-square test between groups