Table 2 Content analysis of focus groups, dyadic interviews, and individual interviews. Generic and subcategories generated using an unconstrained matrix with nine pre-defined main categories
Main categories | Generic categories |
|---|---|
Innovation Source | Mixed perceptions about the origin of PCC |
Evidence strength and quality | Improved health and systems outcomes in patients Lack of awareness of evidence underlining PCC |
Relative advantage | In line with ethical values Improved work routines Sounds intuitively positive and stirs curiosity Identical to previous work Increased workload and deterioration of well-functioning routines |
Adaptability | Adaptable to specific contexts |
Trialability | Initial piloting to test applicability |
Complexity | Abstract phenomenon that gives rise to conflicting views Leaves HCPs with ethical dilemmas and conflicting views Viewing and treating patients as persons is complex Requires a variation in skills and personal qualities in HCPs Requires integration within the team and between HCPs |
Compatibility | Conflicting mixture of norms and values Contrasting perceptions of PCC routines and their fit with existing workflow Perceived similarities between PCC and other concepts increase compatibility |
Observability | More satisfied and involved patients More meaningful, and improved work environment but also demanding Improved relationships and workflow within the team Mixed perceptions of work in team |
Available resources | Requires overcapacity of resources to maintain PCC Physical environment can hamper or facilitate PCC Required resources dependent upon context and operationalisation of the concept |