Skip to main content

Table 2 Participant characteristics

From: Considerations of Australian community pharmacists in the provision and implementation of cognitive pharmacy services: a qualitative study

Participant

Pharmacist position

Age range

Community pharmacy type

IRSD/MMM/PhAria for main community sector job postcode

1

Owner/Hospital staff/Consultant

45–49

Franchise/banner

4/5/4

2

Owner

40–44

Independent

1/5/4

3

Owner/Consultant/Hospital consultant

35–39

Franchise/banner, independent

3/3/1

4

Owner/Academic

40–44

Franchise/banner

4/6/5

5

Staff

30–34

Franchise/banner

No IRSD data (bounded by 3–4)/1/1

6

Owner/Owner/NGO convener

35–39

Independent, independent

1/1/1

7

Owner

60–64

Independent

1/7/6

8

Casual staff

35–39

Franchise/banner, franchise/banner, independent

2/1/1

9

Staff

25–29

Franchise/banner

5/1/1

10

Locum

60–64

Franchise/banner

5/1/1

11

Staff

25–29

Franchise/banner

3/1/1

12

Locum

35–39

Independent

No IRSD data (next to area with 5)/1/1

13

Locum

30–34

Independent

5/1/1

14

Owner

30–34

Franchise/banner

1/5/3

15

Hospital Staff (former locum)

U-25

N/A

Not given

16

Owner

55–59

Independent

2/5/3

17

Manager/Translator

30–34

Independent

3/4/3

18

Staff

45–49

Franchise/banner

No IRSD data/1/1

19

Manager

25–29

Friendly society

2/5/3

20

Owner

35–39

Franchise/banner

3/1/1

22

Staff/Hospital staff/Casual staff

U-25

Franchise/banner, Independent, franchise/banner

4/1/1

23

Professional association/staff

30–34

Independent

?/1/1

24

Consultant/Manager

30–34

Franchise/banner

1/1/1

  1. IRSD Index of Relative Socioeconomic Index, where 1: Most Disadvantaged, and 5: Least disadvantaged [5]
  2. PhAria Pharmacy Access/Remoteness Index of Australia [7]
  3. MMM Modified Monash Model, where 1: Metropolitan areas, 2: Regional centres, 3: Large rural towns, 4: Medium rural towns, 5: Small rural towns, 7: Very remote communities [8]