From: Health economic evidence in clinical guidelines in South Africa: a mixed-methods study
Thematic areas | Sub-themes | Solutions |
---|---|---|
1. Lack of agreed methods and reporting standards | ā¢ Inconsistent methods / poor standardisation (e.g. clinical end-points or comparators selected) ā¢ Poor reporting of methods ā¢ Methods not agreed by stakeholders in South Africa | ā¢ Develop methods and reporting standards informed by broad based stakeholder consultation |
2. Lack of available data | ā¢ Data from South Africa of costs: - Costs vary by sectors (i.e. public vs. private), settings (e.g. provinces) and levels of care (i.e. primary vs secondary) - Poor availability of costing data ā¢ Outcomes data to inform decisions | ā¢ Strengthen data collection systems ā¢ Develop registries for data collection ā¢ Investment in research |
3. Lack of skills to conduct analyses and use economic evidence | ā¢ Lack of trained health economists, statisticians, mathematicians, team with multi-disciplinary skills ā¢ Lack of skills for CPG developers to read and use HEE | ā¢ Train economists and statisticians to work on HEE for CPGs |
4. Lack of funding/ insufficient resources | ā¢ Training and building necessary skills ā¢ Collecting data/evidence to inform economic models (e.g. clinical outcomes, registries) | ā¢ Investment in research and training |
5. Lack of trust and inability to share | ā¢ Poor sharing of available data (e.g. private to public) | ā¢ Develop agreements between groups to share data respectfully |