AIMS OF STUDY | NUMBER OF STUDIES |
---|---|
Assess perceived motivations and barriers to speaking up (one study also looked at how these barriers differed across two cultures) [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63] | 14 |
Assessment of safety climate / culture / quality / teamwork [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72] | 9 |
Evaluation of an intervention on speaking up, safety or communication [73,74,75,76,77,78,79] | 7 |
4 | |
To describe the nature of interprofessional work and the factors that influence teamwork [84,85,86,87] | 4 |
Assessment of likely harm and relationship to speaking up [88,89,90,91] | 4 |
Impact of management / leadership on psychological safety [21, 92, 93] | 3 |
Explore perceptions of safety following an interprofessional teamwork intervention [94,95,96] | 3 |
To explore perceptions of own ability to speak up and be heard [97,98,99] | 3 |
Professional challenges and reasons for wanting to leave [100] | 1 |
Test relationship between speaking up and technical team performance [101] | 1 |
Explore the process of learning to speak up [102] | 1 |
Identify ethical errors in caring for elderly patients with dementia [103] | 1 |
Exploring how the organisation values psychological safety of its workers and makes workers feel valued [104] | 1 |
Identify critical non-technical skills for safe and effective teamwork [105] | 1 |
Assess speaking up behaviour and safety climate [106] | 1 |
Describe advocacy in anaesthesia care [107] | 1 |
Explore experiences of supervision from seniors [108] | 1 |
Observed how staff members spoke up [109] | 1 |
Explore experiences of being a nurse manager [110] | 1 |