Skip to main content

Table 1 Proportions of older adults in the outpatient physical therapy population and the general total populationa

From: Outpatient physical therapy population has been aging faster than the general population: a total population register-based study

 

Outpatient Physical Therapy Population

General Total Population

Sex

Age (years)

1999

n(%)

2015

n(%)

RRb

(95% CI)

1999

n(%)

2015

n(%)

RRb

(95% CI)

Overall:

Total (N)

24,188 (100%)

43,966 (100%)

 

275,712 (100%)

329,100 (100%)

 

65

4,432 (18.3%)

10,350 (23.5%)

1.23 (1.19-1.27)

31,910 (11.6%)

44,541 (13.5%)

1.15 (1.1-1.21)

65 - 74

2,844 (11.8%)

5,792 (13.2%)

1.07 (1-1.15)

18,071 (6.6%)

24,865 (7.6%)

1.12 (1.05-1.19)

75 - 84

1,410 (5.8%)

3,556 (8.1%)

1.26 (1.16-1.38)

10,461 (3.8%)

13,899 (4.2%)

1.11 (1.03-1.2)

85+

178 (0.7%)

1,002 (2.3%)

3.41 (2.76-4.2)

3,378 (1.2%)

5,777 (1.8%)

1.49 (1.3-1.71)

Men:

Total (n)

9,205 (100%)

17,596 (100%)

 

138,086 (100%)

165,186 (100%)

 

65+

1,599 (17.4%)

3,955 (22.5%)

1.27 (1.21-1.33)

14,341 (10.4%)

20,922 (12.7%)

1.2 (1.14-1.27)

65 - 74

1,035 (11.2%)

2,241 (12.7%)

1.14 (1.04-1.24)

8,668 (6.3%)

12,358 (7.5%)

1.16 (1.09-1.24)

75 - 84

495 (5.4%)

1,344 (7.6%)

1.25 (1.12-1.40)

4,470 (3.2%)

6,413 (3.9%)

1.18 (1.09-1.29)

85+

69 (0.7%)

370 (2.1%)

3.47 (2.65-4.54)

1,203 (0.9%)

2,151 (1.3%)

1.58 (1.35-1.86)

Women:

Total (n)

14,983 (100%)

26,370 (100%)

 

137,626 (100%)

163,914 (100%)

 

65+

2,833 (18.9%)

6,395 (24.3%)

1.22 (1.18-1.27)

17,569 (12.8%)

23,619 (14.4%)

1.12 (1.06-1.17)

65 - 74

1,809 (12.1%)

3,551 (13.5%)

1.04 (0.98-1.11)

9,403 (6.8%)

12,507 (7.6%)

1.08 (1.01-1.15)

75 - 84

915 (6.1%)

2,212 (8.4%)

1.28 (1.18-1.39)

5,991 (4.4%)

7,486 (4.6%)

1.06 (0.98-1.14)

85+

109 (0.7%)

632 (2.4%)

3.4 (2.8-4.14)

2,175 (1.6%)

3,626 (2.2%)

1.45 (1.28-1.63)

  1. a Comparisons of 1999 and 2015, by age group and sex; b Rate ratios (RR) are calculated by applying log-linear regression models to data from all years from 1999 to 2015. Thus, they are not equal to simple RRs calculated using the percentages for the years 1999 and 2015 in this table but are more robust to sudden between-year leaps due to chance