Skip to main content

Table 2 CASP Assessment Results

From: Personal barriers to addressing intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis of healthcare practitioners’ experiences

Author (year) Statement of aim? Qualitative
methodology
appropriate?
Research
design
appropriate?
Recruitment
strategy
appropriate?
Relationship
between
researcher
&
participants
adequately
considered?
Ethical issues
taken into
consideration?
Data
analysis
sufficiently
rigorous?
Findings
supported
by
evidence?
Other limitations? Overall
assessment of quality
Aziz & El-Gazzar [28] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Baig et al. [29] Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Colarossi et al. [30] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Conn et al. Yes Yes Yes Partial Yes Yes Yes Yes Participants were mostly junior residents with less experience. Minor concerns
Columbini et al. [32] Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Djikanovic et al. [33] Yes Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes Yes Yes Methods lack detail. No or very minor concerns
Efe & Taskin [34] Yes Yes Yes yes Unclear Partial Yes Yes No details on ethics and data analysis. Minor concern.
Finnbogadottir & Dykes [35] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Gallagher [36] Yes Yes Yes Partial Unclear Partial Yes Yes Concerns around recruitment and ethics. Minor concerns
Guruge [37] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Husso et al. [38] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Mauri et al. [39] Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial Yes Yes Yes No limitations acknowledged No or very minor concerns
McCauley et al. [40] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Papadakaki et al. [41] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Pau [42] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Pitter [43] Yes yes Yes Partial yes Yes Partial Partial Concerns around sample recruitment, data analysis and discussion. Moderate concerns
Rahmqvist et al. [44] Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Robinson [45] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Rose et al. [46] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Sormanti & Smith [47] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial Yes Yes Concerns about informed consents. Minor concerns
Spangaro et al. [20] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Sun et al. [48] Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial Partial Partial Yes Concern around ethical issues and data collection. Minor concerns
Sundborg et al. [49] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Usta et al. [50] Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial Yes Yes Yes Concerns about data collection (short interviews) Minor concerns
Van der Wath [51] Yes Yes Yes Partial Partial Yes Yes Yes N/A No or minor concerns
Visentin et al. [52] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Watson et al. [53] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Zakar et al. [54] Yes Yes yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A No or very minor concerns
Zijlstra et al. [55] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial Yes Yes Lack of detail on ethical approval Minor concerns