Skip to main content

Table 3 Round 2: Results

From: Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study

Implementation and Sustainability Sub-domains, Elements and Sub-elements

N

Mean

SD

Median

IQR

% Agree

Instructions/Guidance section

ā€ƒThe above suggestions should be incorporated into the Instructions/ Guidance.

32

4.3

0.6

4

1

97%

Engage Relevant Stakeholders

ā€ƒEngaging Relevant Stakeholders should occur throughout the process.

32

4.8

0.4

5

0

100%

Sub-domain One: Develop an Implementation and Sustainability Plan

ā€ƒElement 1

ā€ƒā€ƒThe ā€˜Contentā€™ changes (tracked in blue) make sense.

32

4.0

0.9

4

0

84%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe order above makes sense.

32

4.1

0.7

4

0

97%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe components above are comprehensive.

32

3.9

0.8

4

0

81%

ā€ƒElement 2

ā€ƒā€ƒThe ā€˜Contentā€™ changes (tracked in blue) make sense.

32

4.3

0.7

4

1

94%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe order above makes sense.

32

4.2

0.5

4

0

97%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe components above are comprehensive.

32

4.0

0.6

4

0

84%

ā€ƒElements 3 & 4

ā€ƒā€ƒThe ā€˜Contentā€™ changes (tracked in blue) make sense.

32

4.0

0.9

4

1

84%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe order above makes sense.

32

4.0

0.9

4

1

87%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe components above are comprehensive.

32

4.0

0.8

4

0

84%

ā€ƒElements 5 & 6

ā€ƒā€ƒThe ā€˜Contentā€™ changes (tracked in blue) make sense.

32

3.8

1.0

4

0

84%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe order above makes sense.

32

3.8

1.0

4

0

77%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe components above are comprehensive.

32

3.9

1.0

4

0

81%

ā€ƒElement 7 a & b

ā€ƒā€ƒThe ā€˜Contentā€™ changes (tracked in blue) make sense.

32

4.1

0.7

4

0

94%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe order above makes sense.

32

4.3

0.5

4

1

97%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe components above are comprehensive.

32

3.9

0.9

4

0

81%

ā€ƒElement 7 c & d

ā€ƒā€ƒThe ā€˜Contentā€™ changes (tracked in blue) make sense.

32

4.0

0.8

4

0

84%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe order above makes sense.

32

4.0

0.7

4

0

90%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe components above are comprehensive.

32

3.8

1.0

4

0

77%

ā€ƒSub-domains Two & Three: Implementation and Monitor and Evaluate

ā€ƒā€ƒThe ā€˜Contentā€™ changes (tracked in blue) make sense.

32

4.1

0.5

4

0

94%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe order above makes sense.

32

4.1

0.3

4

0

100%

ā€ƒā€ƒThe components above are comprehensive.

32

3.8

0.8

4

0

84%

  1. IQR: 0ā€‰=ā€‰high consensus; 1ā€‰=ā€‰good consensus; 2ā€‰=ā€‰poor consensus