Skip to main content

Table 3 Round 2: Results

From: Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study

Implementation and Sustainability Sub-domains, Elements and Sub-elements N Mean SD Median IQR % Agree
Instructions/Guidance section
 The above suggestions should be incorporated into the Instructions/ Guidance. 32 4.3 0.6 4 1 97%
Engage Relevant Stakeholders
 Engaging Relevant Stakeholders should occur throughout the process. 32 4.8 0.4 5 0 100%
Sub-domain One: Develop an Implementation and Sustainability Plan
Element 1
  The ‘Content’ changes (tracked in blue) make sense. 32 4.0 0.9 4 0 84%
  The order above makes sense. 32 4.1 0.7 4 0 97%
  The components above are comprehensive. 32 3.9 0.8 4 0 81%
Element 2
  The ‘Content’ changes (tracked in blue) make sense. 32 4.3 0.7 4 1 94%
  The order above makes sense. 32 4.2 0.5 4 0 97%
  The components above are comprehensive. 32 4.0 0.6 4 0 84%
Elements 3 & 4
  The ‘Content’ changes (tracked in blue) make sense. 32 4.0 0.9 4 1 84%
  The order above makes sense. 32 4.0 0.9 4 1 87%
  The components above are comprehensive. 32 4.0 0.8 4 0 84%
Elements 5 & 6
  The ‘Content’ changes (tracked in blue) make sense. 32 3.8 1.0 4 0 84%
  The order above makes sense. 32 3.8 1.0 4 0 77%
  The components above are comprehensive. 32 3.9 1.0 4 0 81%
Element 7 a & b
  The ‘Content’ changes (tracked in blue) make sense. 32 4.1 0.7 4 0 94%
  The order above makes sense. 32 4.3 0.5 4 1 97%
  The components above are comprehensive. 32 3.9 0.9 4 0 81%
Element 7 c & d
  The ‘Content’ changes (tracked in blue) make sense. 32 4.0 0.8 4 0 84%
  The order above makes sense. 32 4.0 0.7 4 0 90%
  The components above are comprehensive. 32 3.8 1.0 4 0 77%
Sub-domains Two & Three: Implementation and Monitor and Evaluate
  The ‘Content’ changes (tracked in blue) make sense. 32 4.1 0.5 4 0 94%
  The order above makes sense. 32 4.1 0.3 4 0 100%
  The components above are comprehensive. 32 3.8 0.8 4 0 84%
  1. IQR: 0 = high consensus; 1 = good consensus; 2 = poor consensus