Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects of preventive service to avoid deterioration to care level 1–5 from support level 1–2 as certification of LTCI system in Japan

From: Prevention services via public long-term care insurance can be effective among a specific group of older adults in Japan

  

No adjusted

Adjusteda

 
  

HR

95%CI

HR

95%CI

Proportionalityb

Age < 85 & Support level 1

(n = 494)

1.43

0.96

2.13

1.33

0.89

1.99

P > 0.05

Age < 85 & Support level 2

(n = 255)

1.00

0.64

1.58

1.16

0.71

1.88

P > 0.05

Age > =85 & Support level 1

(n = 350)

0.63

0.43

0.94

0.65

0.43

0.97

P > 0.05

Age > =85 & Support level 2

(n = 190)

0.76

0.47

1.24

0.84

0.51

1.39

P > 0.05

  1. aAdjusted for sex, use of inpatient and outpatient medical service, disabled status, demented status, income, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores
  2. HR hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
  3. b Schoenfeld Residuals Test