Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects of preventive service to avoid deterioration to care level 1–5 from support level 1–2 as certification of LTCI system in Japan

From: Prevention services via public long-term care insurance can be effective among a specific group of older adults in Japan

  

Adjusted

 
  

HR

95%CI

Proportionalitya

Preventive service

Use

0.96

0.77

1.19

P > 0.05

 

No use

1.00

    

Age

< 85

1.00

    
 

> = 85

1.26

1.01

1.56

P > 0.05

Sex

Male

1.00

    
 

Female

0.76

0.57

1.03

P > 0.05

Certified level

Support level 1

1.00

    
 

Support level 2

1.47

1.17

1.84

P > 0.05

Use of inpatient medical service

Yes

1.64

0.56

4.85

P > 0.05

 

No

1.00

    

Use of outpatient medical service

Yes

0.68

0.23

2.01

P > 0.05

 

No

1.00

    

Disabled status

Dependent

1.12

0.90

1.40

P > 0.05

 

Independent

1.00

    

Demented status

Dependent

2.46

1.95

3.11

P > 0.05

 

Independent

1.00

    

Household income

Low

0.88

0.65

1.17

P > 0.05

 

High and Middle

1.00

    

Charlson Comorbidity Index scores

=0

1.00

    
 

> = 1

0.85

0.65

1.13

P > 0.05

 

> = 3

0.99

0.72

1.36

P > 0.05

 

> = 5

0.92

0.61

1.38

P > 0.05

  1. HR hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
  2. a Schoenfeld Residuals Test