Skip to main content

Table 3 Synthesis of practice implications and RCT interventions

From: Effects, barriers and facilitators in predischarge home assessments to improve the transition of care from the inpatient care to home in adult patients: an integrative review

Integrative synthesis of qualitative and quantitative results in studies in PDHA

   

Implications for interventions

Outcomes

Reference

Setting, diagnosis

Intervention

1

2

2.1

3

4

5

5.1

6

7

IADL/ADL, scale: NEADL

IADL/ADL, Various scales

Quality of Life, scale: EQ-5D

Quality of Life various scales

Mobility

Fear of Falling

Risk of falling

Risk of readmission

AE

Effect (MD or RR), 95% CI

Studies

 

[7]

Acute care, unspecified

Pre- and post- discharge visit + follow up phone calls

Nr

Un

Nr

Ad

Nr

Nr

Nr

Nr

Ad

MD-0.30 [− 1.32 to 0.72]

MD-0.06 [− 0.27 to 0.15]

–

–

–

–

–

RR 1.12 [0.76 to 1.66]

–

 

Stroke rehabilitation unit, stroke

Predischarge home visit

Un

Ad

Nr

Nr

Nr

Un

Nr

Nr

Ad

MD −5.50 [−15.58 to 4.58]

MD −0.23 [− 0.66 to 0.20]

MD 0.03 [−9.40 to 9.46]

MD 0.00 [− 0.41 to 0.41]

–

–

RR 1.41 [0.67 to 2.98]

RR 3.91 [0.88 to 17.46]

–

[22, 25]

Acute care, hip fracture

Individual daily training including use of technical aids + predischarge home visit + instruction from physiotherapist how to walk with technical aids

Nr

Nr

Nr

N

Nr

Ad

Nr

Nr

Nr

–

MD 0.23 [− 0.19 to 0.66]

–

MD − 0.27 [− 0.70 to 0.16]

–

–

–

–

–

[23]

Rehabilitation unit, mixed

Predischarge home visit

Ad

Ad

Nr

Ad

Nr

Un

Nr

Nr

Nr

MD 13.40 [6.88 to 19.92]

MD 2.30 [0.51 to 4.10]

–

MD 1.50 [0.00 to 3.00]

MD 0.27 [− 0.98 to 1.51]

MD 7.00 [− 17.36 to 31.36]

RR 0.50 [0.06 to 3.91]

RR 0.33 [0.02 to 6.65]

–

[53]

Acute care and rehabilitation, hip fracture

Home assessment by occupational therapist prior to discharge

Un

Ad

Nr

Ad

Nr

Un

Nr

Ad

Nr

MD − 0.50 [− 3.47 to 2.47]

MD −0.08 [− 0.59 to 0.43]

MD 0.00 [− 0.13 to 0.13]

MD 0.00 [− 0.51 to 0.51]

–

MD − 1.20 [−6.72 to 4.32]

RR 0.83 [0.47 to 1.45]

RR 0.55 [0.25 to 1.18]

0

[1]

Geriatric acute care, unspecified

Predischarge home visit + post-discharge follow up visit(s) + comprehensive in-hospital geriatric assessment

Ad

Nr

Nr

Un

Nr

Un

Nr

Ad

Nr

–

–

–

–

–

–

RR 0.84 [0.63 to 1.12]

–

–

[24]

Geriatric acute care, unspecified

Predischarge home visit + contacting potential social support + physical therapy + therapeutic modifications

Ad

Nr

Nr

Nr

Nr

Un

Nr

Nr

Ad

–

MD −2.48 [− 3.16 to − 1.80]

–

–

–

–

RR 0.87 [0.50 to 1.49]

RR 1.50 [0.61 to 3.69]

–

[2]

Stroke ward / acute care, stroke

Predischarge Virtual Home Assessment

Ad

Nr

Nr

Un

Nr

Ad

Ad

Un

Ad

MD 12.00 [− 10.57 to 34.57]

MD 0.49 [− 0.51 to 1.49]

MD 0.19 [− 0.08 to 0.46]

MD 0.64 [− 0.37 to 1.65]

MD 2.24 [0.91 to 3.56]

MD − 7.80 [− 12.54 to − 3.06]

–

–

–

  1. Implications: 1) Use environmental assessments together with patients to provide education about hazards. 2) Conduct a functional assessment that includes living reality of the patients and helps the patient to find individual participant goals for therapy. 2.1) Consider potential patient anxieties regarding the assessment situation. 3) Use standardized procedures and materials to guide the PDHA process. Digital solutions could support the collaboration between hospital and community service providers. 4) Provide adequate (verbal and written) patient information about aim, process, assessment, results and consequences of the predischarge home assessment. 5) Provide tailored adaptations based on shared decision-making and involve explicitly patient’s ideas, solutions and expectations in planning home modifications. 5.1) Provide appropriate visualization for discussing recommended aids and home modifications. 6) Tailor the intervention components and mode of delivery to patients’ level and kind of impairments. 7) Consider specific context factors in PDHA-design
  2. AE Adverse effects of intervention, Ad Addressed, Un Unsure, Nr Not reported