Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of nursing staff (N = 3693) and nursing homes (N = 100)

From: Factors associated with staff-to-resident abuse in Norwegian nursing homes: a cross-sectional exploratory study

Variables

Response values

n (%)*

Median (range)

Missing, n (%)

Individual (staff)

 Sex

Female

3362 (91.0)

 

19 (0.5)

Male

312 (8.5)

 

 Age

Years

 

41 (16–75)

236 (6.4)

 Professional occupation

Nursing assistant

1023 (27.7)

 

47 (1.3)

Licensed practical nurse

1553 (42.1)

 

Registered nurse/social educator

1070 (28.9)

 

 Continuous health education

No

2433 (65.9)

 

Yes

1076 (29.1)

 

184 (5.0)

 Overall health

Very good

1293 (35.0)

 

21 (0.6)

Good

1923 (52.1)

 

Neither good nor bad

405 (11.0)

 

Bad

48 (1.3)

 

Very bad

3 (0.08)

 

 Exhaustion

No

2692 (72.9)

 

40 (1.1)

Yes

961 (26.0)

 

 Psychological distress

No psychological distress

2939 (79.6)

 

191 (5.2)

Psychological distress

563 (15.2)

 

 Quality of childhood

Very good

1814 (49.1)

 

34 (0.9)

Good

1264 (34.2)

 

Average

386 (10.5)

 

Difficult

155 (4.2)

 

Very difficult

40 (1.1)

 

 Job satisfaction

Very satisfied

1659 (44.9)

 

18 (0.5)

Satisfied

1583 (42.9)

 

Neither/nor

360 (9.7)

 

Unsatisfied

62 (1.7)

 

Very unsatisfied

11 (0.3)

 

 Intention to leave the job

No

2409 (65.2)

 

64 (1.7)

Yes

1220 (33.0)

 

Attitudes

Higher score = more positive attitudes**

 

28 (8–40)

264 (7.2)

Relational

 Resident aggression

Higher score = less aggression

 

4.2 (1–5)

107 (2.9)

Dichotomised:**, ***

  

- High aggression (median 1.0–4.2)

1866 (50.5)

 

- Less aggression (median 4.3–5.0)

1720 (46.6)

 

 Care-related conflicts

Higher score = less conflicts

 

4.0 (1–5)

129 (3.5)

Dichotomized:**, ***

  

- High conflicts (median 1.0–3.9)

1633 (44.2)

 

- Few conflicts (median 4.0–5.0)

1931 (52.3)

 

Institutional

 Quantitative job demands

Higher score = more demands***

 

2.7 (1–5)

0

 Support from manager

Higher score = more support***, ****

 

4.0 (1–5)

0

 Support from co-workers

Higher score = more support***, ****

 

4.0 (1–5)

0

 Facility size

Number of beds

 

38.5 (8–161)

0

 Location of municipalities

Urban (levels 1–2)

31 (31.0)

  

Suburban (levels 3–4)

42 (42.0)

 

0

Rural (levels 5–6)

27 (27.0)

  
  1. *due to rounding errors, not all numbers add up to 100%
  2. **variable dichotomized due to non-linearity
  3. ***scale/score reversed in regression analysis
  4. ****median score aggregated from individual to nursing home level