Predicting variables | Satisfaction | Benefit | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | |
Step 1: Background variables | .137*** | .084* | ||
Referral source | −.10 | .01 | ||
Caregiver’s gender | .04 | −.02 | ||
Mother tongue | −.02 | −.03 | ||
Socioeconomic status | .10 | .05 | ||
Child’s age | −.05 | −.20** | ||
Child’s psychosocial functioning | .07 | −.04 | ||
Step 2: Specific experiences with neuropaediatric services | .416*** | .227*** | ||
The clinicians easy to understand | .02 | −.04 | ||
Confidence in the clinicians’ professional competence | .09 | −.05 | ||
Confidence in the other staff’s professional skills | −.02 | .08 | ||
Informed about how tests or examinations would be carried out | −.07 | .01 | ||
Got sufficient information about the child’s diagnosis/afflictions | .05 | .17* | ||
The treatment suited to the child’s situation | .48*** | .26** | ||
Involvement in any decisions regarding the child’s treatment | .03 | .00 | ||
Perceiving the clinic’s work as well organised | .07 | .14 | ||
The clinic cooperated well with other public services | .21** | .10 | ||
Total R2 | .553*** | .310*** |