Variations in factors associated with healthcare providers’ intention to engage in interprofessional shared decision making in home care: results of two cross-sectional surveys

Table 3 Factors associated with healthcare professionals’ intention to engage in IP-SDM at study exit (n = 169)^a

Variables	Bivariate analyses^b			Final model^b
Variables	β	95% CI	p-value^a	β	95% CI	p-value^╫
Age (in years)	− 0.001	− 0.025 to 0.022	0.929	–	–	–
Sex
Female (vs male)	0.21	−0.65 to 1.08	0.597	–	–	–
Number of clients served per week	−0.022	−0.040 to − 0.004	0.015	–	–	–
Profession			0.036^d			0.001
Nurses (vs Social workers)	−0.00	− 0.68 to 0.66	0.982	0.02	−0.25 to 0.29	0.888
Rehabilitation team (vs Social workers)	−0.36	−1.00 to 0.28	0.257	−0.39	−0.72 to − 0.07	0.018
Technicians (vs Social workers)	−1.78	−2.99 to − 0.58	0.005	− 0.41	−0.86 to 0.03	0.069
Social, community & education paraprofessionals (vs Social workers)	0.21	−0.51 to 0.95	0.547	−0.06	−0.48 to 0.35	0.760
Social influence	0.99	0.86 to 1.11	< 0.0001	0.34	0.22 to 0.46	< 0.0001
Beliefs about capabilities	0.99	0.88 to 1.09	< 0.0001	0.46	0.25 to 0.68	< 0.0001
Moral norm	0.87	0.68 to 1.07	< 0.0001	–	–	–
Beliefs about consequences	1.08	0.95 to 1.21	< 0.0001	0.42	0.21 to 0.63	< 0.001
Intervention
Intervention (vs no intervention)	−0.30	−0.98 to 0.38	0.355	–	–	–
R²				77.1%

^aActivities coordinators were not considered in the analyses given the small number of participants (n = 2)
^bLinear mixed regression model with adjustment for clustering
^aAt 0.20 alpha level
^dOverall p-value
“-” This variable was not kept in the final model
^╫ A p-value of < 0.10 was used as the threshold for statistical significance in the final models

ISSN: 1472-6963