Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the models’ advantages and challenges

From: Models and methods for determining the optimal number of beds in hospitals and regions: a systematic scoping review

 

Score model

Capacity model

Basic scenario model

CHUV model

SHO model

The Greater Glasgow model

Israeli model

The Trends in Acute Care Bed Use model

Current Use Projection Model

The Status Quo model

Michigan’s Bed Need model

Advantages

Investigates future demographic changes

  

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

 

*

Easy estimation

*

        

*

 

Considers regional population distribution

      

*

*

*

  

Considers population age and sex composition

  

*

  

*

*

*

*

  

Estimates bed requirements by the type of clinical specialties

 

*

 

*

*

*

*

*

*

 

*

Considers trends in hospital service utilization

 

*

 

*

*

  

*

   

Considers performance and efficiency of hospital

     

*

     

Accounts for patient migration

    

*

*

 

*

   

Considers medical and technological advances

     

*

 

*

   

Considers care models and standards

 

*

   

*

     

Considers emergency cases and future trends

     

*

     

Considers various scenarios

 

*

*

*

*

      

Considers seasonal effects

 

*

         

Easy to use

*

          

A software is available

*

          

challenges

Requires accurate and comprehensive data

          

*

Difficulty of demographic predictions

NA

NA

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

NA

*

Difficulty of predicting patterns of hospital service utilization

 

*

 

*

*

  

*

   

Does not account for policy changes overtimes

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Overestimation of required bed numbers

      

*

*

   

Difficulty of mapping scenarios

NA

*

*

*

*

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Does not assign weightings to the parameters

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Needs a simulation software

*

          
  1. NA Not Applicable