Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds Ratios as a measure of the relative importance of the six attributes selected and the significance of the differences of these odds ratios (pairwise comparison)

From: A discrete choice experiment to identify the most efficient quality indicators for the supervision of psychiatric hospitals

Attributes (variable label)Odds Ratio95% CIPairwise comparison of the odds ratios
DysfuncInternGuideScreeningNetwork
Prevention compulsory treatment (Compuls)3,962.88–5.44n.s.n.s.n.s.
Policy dysfunctional professionals (Dysfunc)3,942.85–5.45 n.s.n.s.
Quality internal research (Intern)3,852.70–5.49  n.s.
Implementation guidelines suicidal behaviour (Guide)2,992.07–4.32   §§
Screening/treatment somatic symptoms (Screening)2,041.46–2.84    n.s.
Policy integrated care (Network)1,951.46–2.84     
  1. n.s.: the difference between odd ratios is not statistically significant
  2. §: the difference between odd ratios is statistically significant, p < 0.01
  3. ¶: the difference between odd ratios is statistically significant, p < 0.05
\