Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds Ratios as a measure of the relative importance of the six attributes selected and the significance of the differences of these odds ratios (pairwise comparison)

From: A discrete choice experiment to identify the most efficient quality indicators for the supervision of psychiatric hospitals

Attributes (variable label)

Odds Ratio

95% CI

Pairwise comparison of the odds ratios

Dysfunc

Intern

Guide

Screening

Network

Prevention compulsory treatment (Compuls)

3,96

2.88–5.44

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

Policy dysfunctional professionals (Dysfunc)

3,94

2.85–5.45

 

n.s.

n.s.

Quality internal research (Intern)

3,85

2.70–5.49

  

n.s.

Implementation guidelines suicidal behaviour (Guide)

2,99

2.07–4.32

   

§

§

Screening/treatment somatic symptoms (Screening)

2,04

1.46–2.84

    

n.s.

Policy integrated care (Network)

1,95

1.46–2.84

     
  1. n.s.: the difference between odd ratios is not statistically significant
  2. §: the difference between odd ratios is statistically significant, p < 0.01
  3. ¶: the difference between odd ratios is statistically significant, p < 0.05