Skip to main content

Table 3 Ratings assigned to CFIR constructs amongst high and low success schools

From: Factors affecting the implementation of a whole school mindfulness program: a qualitative study using the consolidated framework for implementation research

 

High implementation success

Low implementation success

 

School ID

1

2

3

4

5

 

1. Intervention characteristics

 Intervention Source

E

E

E

E

E

 

 Evidence Strength and Quality

+ 2

+ 2

+ 1

+ 2

+ 1

 

 Relative Advantage

+ 1

Missing

0

+ 1

Missing

 

 Adaptability

+ 1

+ 2

+ 1

+ 1

+ 2

 

 Trialability

+ 2

+ 2

+ 2

+ 2

+ 2

 

 Complexity (reverse rated)

0

0

-1

−2

−2

a

 Design Quality and Packaging

0

Mixed

Mixed

−1

Mixed

 

 Cost

0

Missing

0

0

0

 

 Personal Impact

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

Mixed

+ 1a

 

2. Outer setting

 Patient Needs and Resources

+ 1

+ 2

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

 

 Cosmopolitanism

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

 

 Peer Pressure

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

 

 External Policy and Incentives

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

 

3. Inner setting

 Structural Characteristics

+ 1

+ 1

X

−2

+ 1

a

 Networks and Communications

+ 2

+ 2

X

−2

− 2

b

 Culture

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

 

 Implementation Climate:

  Tension for change

+ 2

Missing

+ 2

+ 2

Missing

 

  Compatibility

+ 2

+ 1

+ 1

−1

−1a

a

  Relative priority

+ 2

+ 2

+ 1

−2

−2

b

  Organizational Incentives and Rewards

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

 

  Goals and Feedback

0

0

0

0

0

 

  Learning climate

+ 2

+ 1

Mixed

−1

Mixed

a

 Readiness for Implementation:

  Leadership Engagement

+ 2

+ 2

+ 2

−2

−2

b

  Available resources

−1

−2

− 2

−2

− 1

 

  Access to knowledge and information

Mixed

Mixed

+ 1

Mixed

0

 

4. Characterisitics of individuals

 Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention

+ 2

+ 2

+ 2

−2

−1

b

 Self-efficacy

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

 

 Individual Stage of Change

Mixed

+ 1

+ 1

Mixed

+ 1

 

 Individual Identification with Organisation

M

M

M

M

M

 

 Other Personal Attributes

+ 1a

+ 1

Mixed

Mixed

+ 1

 

5. Process

 Planning

+ 2

+ 2

+ 1

+ 1

−1

a

 Engaging:

  Opinion Leaders

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

Missing

 

  Formally Appointed Internal Implementation Leaders

+ 2

+ 2

−1

−2

− 1

b

  Champions

Missing

Missing

Missing

+ 2

+ 1

 

  External Change Agents

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

0

 

  Key Stakeholders

0

0

+ 2

−1

+ 1a

 

  Innovation Participants

+ 1

+ 1

+ 2

+ 2a

+ 1

 

  Executing

+ 2

+ 2

−2

−2

−2

b

  Reflecting and Evaluating

0

0

0

0

0

 
  1. E Treated MT as externally developed; I Treated MT as internally developed; ‘Mixed’ indicates a mix of positive and negative valency; Missing: indicates no qualitative data was found to correspond to the construct; A a denoted that the construct weakly distinguished between successful and less successful schools and b denotes that the construct strongly distinguished between them