Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of selected variables on TB screening of household contact of index TB cases by HEWs in Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia, 2018

From: Implementation status of household contact tuberculosis screening by health extension workers: assessment findings from programme implementation in Tigray region, northern Ethiopia

Variables

Household contact screened for TB by HEWs

COR(95% CI)

AOR(95% CI)

No (%)

Yes (%)

Types of district

 Rural

277(86)

67(75.3)

1

1

 Urban

45(14)

22(24.7)

2.02 (1.137–3.594*

1.24 (0.54–2.86)

Index TB case diagnosed time

  < 6 Months

74(23)

11(12.4)

1

1

 6–12 Months

189(58.7)

58(65.2)

2.10 (1.027–4.150)*

2.24 (0.68–7.57)

  > 12 Months

59(18.3)

20(22.5)

2.28 (1.013–5.133)*

1.70 (0.44–6.51)

Site of DOTS in intensive phase

 Primary hospital

80(24.8)

21(23.6)

1

1

 Health center

218(67.7)

52(58.4)

0.91 (0.515–1.603)

0.65 (0.31–1.40)

 Health post

24(7.5)

16(18)

2.54 (1.148–5.621)*

1.68(0.56–5.01)

Having treatment supporter during intensive phase

 No

75(23.3)

12(13.5)

1

1

 Yes

247(76.7)

77(86.5)

1.95 (1.01–3.77)*

2.55 (1.06–6.10)*

Household members had received health education on TB by HEWs

 No

265(82.3)

25(28.1)

1

1

 Yes

57(17.7)

64(71.9)

11.9 (6.91–20.50)***

4.28 (2.04–9.00)***

Household had visited by HEW in the last 6 months

 No

274(85.1)

27(30.3)

1

1

 Yes

48(14.9)

62(69.7)

13.12 (7.59–22.63)***

5.84(2.81–12.17)***

Household’s mother was member of WDA team

 No

231(71.7)

51(57.3)

1

1

 Yes

91(28.3)

38(42.7)

1.89 (1.16–3.078)

0.72(0.35–1.51)

Household’s index TB case visited by WDA leaders

 No

233(72.4)

34(38.2)

1

1

 Don’t know/NA

12(3.7)

3(3.4)

1.71 (0.46–6.38)

2.26 (0.40–12.84)

 Yes

77(23.9)

52(58.4)

4.63 (2.80–7.66)***

1.84 (0.89–43.81)

Household’s members had received health education by WDG leaders

 No

294(91.3)

66(74.2)

1

1

 Yes

28(8.7)

23(25.8)

3.66 (1.98–6.75)***

1.66 (0.44–6.18)

Household’s members had screened for TB by WDA leaders

 No

302(93.8)

67(75.3)

1

1

 Yes

20(6.2)

22(24.7)

4.96 (2.56–9.60)***

0.97 (0.24–3.85)

Educational status of the serving HEWs

 Certificate

79(25.9)

22(25.6)

1

1

 Diploma (HEWS)

204(66.9)

44(51.2)

0.78 (0.436–1.375)

1.18(0.47–2.95)

 Diploma (Nurse)

22(7.2)

20(23.3)

3.26 (1.514–7.037)***

5.18(0.80–33.60)

HEWs had discussions with WDA leaders on TB activities

 No

44(14.4)

2(2.3)

1

1

 Yes

261(85.6)

84(97.7)

7.1(1.681–29.831)**

9.51(1.49–60.75)*

Availability of recording tools in the serving health posts

 Poor

134(43.9)

27(31.4)

1

1

 Fair

171(56.1)

59(68.6)

1.71(1.03–2.847)*

1.84(0.75–4.52)

  1. *statistically significant at 0.05 < p < 0.01, ** statistically significant at 0.01 < p < 0.001, *** statistically significant at p < 0.001
  2. Variables with P-value < 0.25 in bivariate analysis were entered in the final model (Time taken to reach health facility, household average monthly income, family size, knowledge of the respondents on TB, type of index TB case, index TB case currently on treatment, marital status of the serving HEW, involvement of Kebeles administrator on TB program and availability of job aid in the serving health post)