Component | Questions |
Coherence (meaning and sense making by participants) | Is the toolkit package easy to describe? |
Is it clearly distinct from other interventions? | |
Does the toolkit package have a clear purpose for all relevant participants? | |
Do clinicians and patients have a shared sense of its purpose? | |
What are the perceived benefits of the toolkit package and for whom? | |
Are these benefits valued by clinicians and patients? | |
Does the toolkit package fit with the overall goals and activity of the service? | |
Cognitive participation (commitment & engagement by participants) | Are target user groups likely to think the toolkit package is a good idea? |
Do clinicians and patients see the point of the toolkit package easily? | |
Will clinicians and patients be prepared to invest time, energy and work to use the toolkit package? | |
Collective action (work participants do to make the intervention function) | How does the toolkit package affect the work of clinicians? |
Does it promote or impede their work? | |
Do clinicians require extensive training before they can use the toolkit package? | |
How compatible is it with existing work practices? | |
What impact will it have on division of labour, resources, power and responsibility between different professional groups? | |
Will it fit with the overall goals and activity of the service? | |
Reflexive Monitoring (participants reflect on or appraise the intervention) | How are clinicians likely to perceive the toolkit package once it has been in use for a while? |
Is it likely to be perceived as advantageous for patients or staff? | |
Will it be clear what effects the toolkit package has had? | |
Can clinicians or patients contribute feedback about the toolkit package once it is already in use? | |
Can the toolkit package be adapted/ improved on the basis of experience? |