Skip to main content

Table 3 Staff -Level Sustainability Perceptions: Linear Mixed Model Results for Model 2

From: Influence of participation in a quality improvement collaborative on staff perceptions of organizational sustainability

  Estimate Std. Err. df t Sign. 95% CI
Total Sustainability Score (Primary Outcome)
Intercept 82.22 1.56 984 52.63 p = .0001 79.15–85.28
 Time4,1 7.17 1.55 867 4.62 p = .0001 4.12–10.22
 Time4,2 3.00 1.53 877 1.960 p = .05 −.01–6.00
 Time4,3 0.12 1.51 890 0.08 p > .05 −2.85 – 3.08
 Comb vs. learning 3.28 1.47 1842 2.228 p = .026 −6.173461
 Comb vs. circles 2.15 1.53 1848 1.407 p > .05 −0.85 – 5.14
 Comb vs. coaching 0.21 1.44 1850 −0.15 p > .05 −2.62 – 3.04
 Job Function (clinical) −3.50 1.07 1850 −3.27 p = .001 −5.59 – −1.40
Process Domain Score (Secondary Outcome)
Intercept 25.20 0.49 981 51.46 =.0001 24.23–26.16
 Time4,1 2.18 0.49 884 4.44 p = .0001 1.22–3.14
 Time4,2 0.92 0.48 902 1.89 p > .05 −0.03 – 1.87
 Time4,3 − 0.58 0.46 866 1.26 p > .05 −1.49 – 0.33
 Comb vs. learning 0.80 0.46 1872 1.74 p > .05 −0.10 – 1.70
 Comb vs. circles 0.62 0.47 1900 1.31 p > .05 −0.31 – 1.55
 Comb vs. coaching −0.28 0.45 1888 −0.62 p > .05 −1.16 – 0.61
 Job Function (clinical) −1.72 0.33 1891 −5.18 p = .0001 −2.37 – − 1.07
Staff Domain Score (Secondary Outcome)
Intercept 43.16 0.91 979 47.51 p = .0001 41.37–44.94
 Time4,1 3.35 0.90 881 3.71 p = .0001 1.58–5.12
 Time4,2 1.46 0.88 891 1.65 p > .05 −0.27 – 3.20
 Time4,3 0.56 0.89 889 0.63 p > .05 −1.18 – 2.30
 Comb vs. learning 1.70 0.86 1892 1.97 p = .049 0.01–3.39
 Comb vs. circles 0.87 0.89 1894 0.98 p > .05 −0.87 – 2.62
 Comb vs. coaching 0.15 0.84 1896 0.17 p > .05 −1.51 – 1.80
 Job Function (clinical) −1.50 0.62 1894 −2.40 p = .017 −2.72 – − 0.27
Organization Domain Score (Secondary Outcome)
Intercept 13.52 0.31 1017 42.92 p = .0001 12.90–14.14
 Time4,1 1.32 0.31 903 4.22 p = .0001 0.70–1.93
 Time4,2 0.81 0.31 908 2.64 p = .008 0.21–1.42
 Time4,3 0.24 0.30 912 0.80 p > .05 −0.35 – 0.84
 Comb vs. learning 0.69 0.30 1921 2.34 p = .019 0.11–1.27
 Comb vs. circles 0.36 0.31 1932 1.17 p > .05 −0.24 – 0.96
 Comb vs. coaching −0.17 0.29 1932 −0.58 p > .05 −0.73 – 0.40
 Job Function (clinical) −0.31 0.21 1932 −1.47 p > .05 −0.73 – 0.11